By Ryan “Dickie” Thompson, Punk‑Rock Libertarian | Cebu, Philippines – June 18, 2025

---

I’m diving straight into it—no fluff, no filter, just unvarnished truth. I’ve been here in Cebu for eight months now, and I keep hearing the same refrain: “Filipino women are strong‑willed—and you wouldn’t date that.” Let me tell you exactly why that’s bullshit.

I love strong women. Always have. Not the shrill, self‑antagonizing, “call‑me‑queen” kind—no, I want a real partner, a teammate, someone who can stand shoulder‑to‑shoulder with me in the trenches.

Let me lay out the facts with brutal honesty, because I’ve lived this story:

🛠️ The Ex‑Who Was Married—Strong and Reliable

My first wife? Fierce as hell. She earned a full scholarship to Westminster—it’s one of the best business schools in the Western Hemisphere—before she dropped out because she felt out of place around wealthier students. But then she came to work with me. Right out of high school she made $30/hour as media director. She fixed our Land Rover during Maine’s brutal winters when my body was broken from that car accident. That’s strength.

We both earned—but I consistently made three times her income. We built a household where she homeschooled our kids, and I held down the provider role. That’s a power couple dynamic: independent, capable, united.

🌴 The Kona Jewelry Partner—Strong… and Criminal

Then there was the girl from Hawaii. Strong-willed? Absolutely. She launched a jewelry store with me—her parents even financed it. But it turned toxic quick. Reckless driving tickets, assault charges, felony convictions, violence against me and my daughter. That… that’s insufferable. That’s what I call crossing the line: strong-willed with a toxic spin.

🪶 The Recent Wife—Again, Crossing That Line

My current marriage? New bride, beautiful—another high‑octane Capricorn. Strong-willed but… she came with deferred-sentence baggage: assault on an ex‑boyfriend six months before we tied the knot. She assaulted me post‑wedding too. I said “No more.” That’s the difference between strength and insufferability. Progressive discipline, yes—but not abuse.

👩‍👦 The Mom—Subtle Insufferability

And then there’s my mother. Not headstrong by nature, but subtle: physical attacks, lying to police to pin blame on my dad. That’s insufferable behavior. Don’t mistake weak-willed for insufferable—one is harmless, the other destructive.

---

The Filipino Female Reality

Here in Cebu, most people survive on under ₱20,000 (~US $400) a month. Single moms juggle multiple jobs and responsibilities. They’re resilient, firm, and capable—but here’s the kicker: culturally, they want traditional roles. They prefer community, faith-rooted houses, strong men as leaders, and women who cooperate—not dominate. Catholic values are alive here. I’ve been touring towns across Cebu, and I’ve yet to see a pride flag. LGBTQ+ people exist, yes—but there’s not the same uproar you see in the West. That encroachment of Western feminism? It’s whispering in—but it doesn’t scream here.

So when people say “Filipino women are strong‑willed in a way you won’t accept,” they misunderstand. That’s not true. I do date strong-willed women. I married strong-willed women. But I never tolerate insufferable behavior—unbearable arrogance, abuse, toxicity. Dictionary definition: “too extreme to bear or intolerable; having or showing unbearable arrogance or conceit; an insufferable bully.” That’s what broke my marriages—not their strength, but their toxicity.

---

What Defines a Real Partnership?

1) Strength with Accountability
A strong woman doesn’t dominate—she collaborates. My ex‑wife ran media campaigns and homeschooled. She supported our mission. A partner’s strength should reinforce family bonds, not dissolve them.

2) A Shared Vision of Roles
I always aim to lead in public: provider, protector, strategist. A good partner leads in private: nurturing, teaching, running the household. Two heads, one mission.

3) Mutual Submission ≠ Weakness
Feminists love to scream that “submission” is misogynistic. Not when you understand it properly. Submission is mutual. He submits to her needs; she submits to his mission; they submit to a greater purpose—their family, their values.

“Wives submit to husbands” is Biblical—but that’s just half the story. Husbands submit too: to the peace, growth, and well‑being of the household. That’s not weakness—that’s unity.

4) Strong-Willed ≠ Insufferable
Capricorn, Phoenix, Aries… I’ve dated untamed women who had rightful ambition. That alone was never a problem. Some of the strongest people I know are women. The problem arises when strength turns into toxicity—domination, disregard for mutual respect, violence, entitlement.

---

Why Does This Matter?

If you’re building a life—raising children, fostering independence, spreading a message—weak partners hold you back. But insufferable ones destroy that foundation. You need strength, not toxicity. That’s what Disruptarian is all about: freeing individuals and families to build voluntary, resilient communities. That starts with strong, respectful partnerships.

---

Final Takeaways

• Yes, I love strong women. Those who hustle, who fix problems, who stare the cold in the face and say “Bring it on.”
• No, I don’t tolerate toxicity. If your strength turns into cruelty, dominance, or undermine respect—you’ve crossed the line.
• Traditional roles are not weakness. They are functional. The man leads, the woman supports. But both lead in equal measure—in different arenas.
• Mutual submission isn’t chauvinism. It’s necessary. It keeps the peace, builds unity, and strengthens hearts—especially in a family.
• Culture matters. Cebu’s values remind me that resilience doesn’t mean rejection of tradition. You can respect heritage and move forward freely.

So don’t sell me the weak‑vs‑strong tropes. I want strength—with humility, unity, and mutual deep respect. I’m building a Disruptarian future—and that starts at home.

By Ryan “Dickie” Thompson

In what can only be described as a spectacle of ideological narcissism, a group of progressive Western activists decided to take their performance art all the way to the Middle East. And as Def Noodles perfectly observed in his brutally honest breakdown, this was less “Queers for Palestine” and more like “Chickens for KFC.”

From the moment their boots hit Egyptian soil, these activists were met with a reality far removed from their TikTok fantasy. Crying about heatstroke at military checkpoints, comparing themselves to caged animals, and recording shaky livestreams pleading for global help—they were living proof that Western emotionalism doesn’t hold much sway in the real world.

These weren’t revolutionaries. They were ideological tourists armed with hashtags, tote bags, and zero understanding of where they were or what they were doing. They thought their moral signaling would grant them a diplomatic free pass. Instead, they got their passports confiscated, were kettled by riot police, and ultimately deported.

Identity Politics Meets Geopolitical Reality

Let’s call this what it is: a masterclass in the failure of Western academia and activism. Raised in echo chambers where feelings equal facts and where chanting slogans is mistaken for strategy, these activists walked into Egypt—a country that executes gays and has fought wars over Palestinian extremism—thinking they could impose their worldview.

They claimed to be risking their lives for justice. But what they were really doing was demanding that a sovereign nation ignore its own national security so they could feel morally validated. It’s the same self-centered moral imperialism they claim to fight against.

This isn’t bravery. It’s delusion dressed up in progressive drag.

The Entitlement Olympics

One Canadian activist, stunned that Egypt wasn’t treating their group like a humanitarian field trip, complained about being herded, dehydrated, and detained. But when you enter a foreign, militarized zone and openly support Hamas—a recognized terror group—what did you expect? Bottled water and a diversity seminar?

This isn’t downtown Toronto. This is Egypt. And Egypt doesn’t care about your pronouns, your degree, or your trauma arc.

The image of a British activist wailing in the desert, pleading to be allowed to “march to Fallstine” while Egyptian police stand stoic and unmoved, says it all. It’s not just cringe. It’s civilizational decay caught in high definition.

A Failure of Institutions

These activists are the fruit of institutions that have replaced education with indoctrination, diplomacy with virtue signaling, and humility with hubris. Harvard degrees. Zero geopolitical awareness. Loud voices. No grounding in truth.

They cry colonizer at every Western structure, yet beg for Western embassy support the second they meet real resistance. They decry border enforcement, until they’re the ones trying to cross it. They denounce state power until they need it.

That isn’t activism. That’s entitlement.

When Fantasy Meets Force

This wasn’t some humanitarian crisis. It was the inevitable collision of radical ideology with immovable sovereignty. These weren’t heroes. They were provocateurs. They showed up to a volatile region, trying to stage a circus in a war zone. And when Egypt responded the way any rational state would—with decisive force—they melted down.

Some even screamed “F*** you Egypt” while still on Egyptian soil, in custody, under the guard of armed forces. That’s not bravery. That’s Darwin Award-level stupidity.

The Darwin Awards of Diplomacy

You can’t scream about oppression while hitching your activism to Hamas, an organization that executes gays, rapes women, and uses civilians as shields. You can’t demand international intervention while claiming to stand against imperialism. And you can’t play revolutionary while calling for safe spaces and embassy support the second things go sideways.

This is what happens when your worldview is built on TikTok slogans and filtered Instagram stories. When you believe feelings are foreign policy, and that every conflict is just another stage for your next virtue signal.

Activism or Narcissism?

The real takeaway isn’t just about the idiocy of this particular group. It’s about how far Western culture has drifted from reality. These people were raised in soft institutions, coddled by safe spaces, and trained to believe their moral outrage could bend geopolitics.

But the world doesn’t care. Sovereign nations don’t run on hashtags. They run on power, history, and consequence.

And Egypt? Egypt just gave us a wake-up call. They made it clear that virtue-signaling clowns aren’t welcome. Not now. Not ever.

Conclusion: Sovereignty Still Matters

Let this debacle serve as a warning: the era of Western moral imperialism is over. You can cry. You can hashtag. You can even livestream your tantrum. But outside the Western bubble, those things are meaningless.

In the real world, borders matter. Sovereignty matters. And if you walk into someone else’s country with delusions of grandeur, expect to get bounced.

If you think you’re a hero for marching into Egypt to fight for Hamas, you might want to ask the locals what they think first. Spoiler alert: they’re not impressed. They’re angry. And they’re not going to play along with your Western savior fantasy.

So yes, Def Noodles was absolutely right. This wasn’t a movement. It was a mockery.

It wasn’t resistance. It was cosplay.

And in the end, the only thing these activists liberated was their own passports—right into the hands of the Egyptian border police.

Maybe next time, they’ll think before marching blindly into a region they neither understand nor respect.

But I doubt it.

This Father’s Day, I take a moment to remember and honor a man who left an indelible mark—not just on me, but on all nine of his children and the generations to come. My father, Richard Glen Thompson, was a man of immense complexity, fierce integrity, and tireless dedication. His ideals weren’t just beliefs; they were calls to action.

Dad never waited for someone else to step in. If something needed fixing, he’d be the first with his sleeves rolled up. He wore many hats in his professional life—from serving on the city planning commission to running his own construction company. One of his proudest civic achievements was spearheading a sewage system plan for Mapleton, Utah. He secured large industrial pumps from Geneva Steel and crafted a comprehensive project proposal. The city chose another direction, but I believe they’ve since realized his vision was the wiser one.

He never chased recognition, but he earned every bit of respect.

My dad was a deeply proud family man. Out of his nine children, eight of us remain to honor him, while our brother Justin rests by his side. He loved to boast about his children and grandchildren—18 in total at the time of his passing. Anytime he met someone new, he’d almost instantly say, “I have 9 children,” always with pride shining in his eyes.

He raised us with affection, humor, and often, a few animals. From as early as I can remember, Dad worked hard to maintain a ranch. I recall the days in Arizona when he brought in a herd of cattle. A business trip took him away, leaving Mom and me to manage on our own. That year was tough—we lost a lot of calves—but those experiences taught me lessons in responsibility and resilience.

Dad was a cowboy in every sense. He worked ranches in his youth, rode horses like it was second nature, and carried himself with the kind of grit and honor you find in classic Westerns. He made sure his children grew up with cows, horses, dogs, and cats. We learned tenderness and empathy from the animals he surrounded us with.

My best memories are of working alongside him in construction. He demanded both excellence and honesty. Though we didn’t always see eye to eye, every tough moment came with a valuable lesson.

Dad faced his share of injustice too. Toward the end of his life, he endured pain, betrayal, and unfair treatment. One of the most vivid memories I carry is seeing my mom attack him in a rage simply because he came home late after stopping for a beer. She hit him, even with a chair. He never retaliated, but she still had him arrested with false accusations. That experience stayed with me—and taught me a hard but vital lesson: protect your reputation.

It’s one of the reasons I later founded a security and surveillance company. I always kept a DVR in my vehicle and cameras on my property—because I learned the cost of being defenseless against lies. I explore this further in my article on reputation destruction: Feminism’s Overreach and Society’s Inevitable Pushback.

Dad never demanded sympathy or justice. He just kept going, doing what needed to be done, loving fiercely, and standing tall.

In a conversation with my daughter recently, I thought of something that struck my heart—I believe that they would’ve been great friends. They share that same resilient, creative, and principled soul. And yes, she wants to be a cowboy too. Though she never got to meet him, I wish she would have so badly.

I miss him every day. We all do. But his legacy is alive and well—in our work, our values, and our stories.

Dad, may you finally rest. You earned that peace more than anyone I know.

Love,
Ryan Richard Thompson

Richard Glen Thompson

Dad was a complex man, with strong ideals. If Dad saw something that he wished to see changed, Dad would try to change it.

Dad in his professional life wore many hats. Whether he was on the city planning commission, or working in his own construction business, he tried to be the man for every job he could do. When he saw a need in Mapleton, UT for a sewage system, Dad worked day and night for months on a plan. He even got large pumps donated from Geneva Steel to the city, and used his skills and experience as a project manager to write up a full proposal.

They went with a different plan, but I think they wish now that they would have used his ideas instead.

Everyone has regret though. I think everyone wishes different life situations turned out differently. I know I miss my dad, and I know his 8 remaining children do as well. Out of Dad’s nine children, eight remain here to mourn him—and our much-missed brother Justin is with him now.

All of us wish we would have had more time with him. He was such a joy to be around. His silly sense of humor, his musical talents, and his hunting stories were all qualities that his loved ones know and miss.

Dad was so proud of all his 9 children and 18 grandchildren. He even has a great-grandchild on the way right now.

I remember when Dad would meet someone new—and I was there with him—one of the first things he would tell them is: “I have 9 children.” He would always find a way to casually mention that. That’s definitely something to be proud of, especially when you know all my siblings: Melanie, Michelle, Robin, Stacy, Valerie, Ryan, Melissa, Brad, and Justin.

Believe it or not, Dad and I have a lot in common. That’s just one of many things. Talking with my sisters recently reminded me of how much we all share with Dad.

My brother Brad was Dad’s best friend in the world. They enjoyed many years of good conversation and working together. Working with Dad holds my most cherished memories of him.

When Dad had a construction company, he always had me help him. He believed a contract was no better than a handshake and a promise. He was so innocent and sweet like that.

In the last part of his life, he endured health problems and hardships. He was a strong man—but not even Superman is invincible.

May Dad finally have peace and rest. He deserves it.

Love,
Ryan Richard Thompson
01/02/2008

Happy Fathers day, and even happier if you still have yours!

PDF version: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ejx3pVYoTU_dkfyDIrnf_ZrXRIB5rBw6/view?usp=sharing

On June 4, 2025, just before America erupted in flames, I released an episode of Disruptarian Radio titled Echoes Through the Ashes. In it, I warned how the radical Left was engineering chaos in this country. Just two days later, BLM riots exploded in cities like LA, Chicago, New York, and San Francisco. As I narrated scenes of cars set ablaze and masked militants clashing with the National Guard, it became undeniably clear: this wasn’t spontaneous outrage. It was a political strike.

🔥 The Build-Up: A House on Fire Waiting for a Spark

These riots were not just predictable—they were orchestrated. I laid out the timeline: ever since Trump’s first term, we’ve seen escalating Leftist violence. Antifa, BLM, sanctuary-city defiance—all pieces in a growing pattern. Foreign flags flying at U.S. protests show how disconnected these movements are from American values. When the National Guard hit the streets, it was proof their rhetoric had crossed into outright threat.

This isn’t just theory. After 2020, right-wing groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers drew their momentum directly from Leftist riots. BLM’s posturing wasn’t a cry for justice—it was a spark to a powder keg. The Left builds riots. The Right builds arms.

📉 The Domino Effect: Politicizing Lawlessness

While our cities burned, Democratic leaders didn’t just turn a blind eye—they poured gasoline on the fire. I played audio receipts:

• LA City Council’s Hernandez: “When they show up, we show up stronger.”
• Mayor Karen Bass: “We fight for all Angelinos, regardless of papers.”
• Maxine Waters: “Why are the guns there?”

I called them out for what they were: enablers. Political elites siding with chaos to score ideological points. These weren’t cries for reform. They were signals to the mob: burn louder, we’ve got your back.

📈 Political Capital from Anarchy

The strategy is clear. Create unrest, then frame conservatives—Trump, law enforcement, critics of sanctuary policies—as the overreacting bad guys. But polls suggest it’s backfiring. Reports show immigrant voters shifting right by up to 40 points since 2020. Even if that figure’s debated, the trend is undeniable: people are sick of political violence.

Yet the Left keeps gaslighting. They call riots “protests.” They claim the violence is overstated. Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters—they try to sanitize the mess they helped create. I exposed their lies.

🎯 The Trigger and the Prediction

This is where my June 4th broadcast comes in. I predicted this. I said the division would erupt into flames. And 48 hours later, it did. That’s not coincidence. That’s what happens when you follow the data and connect the dots. That’s the power of independent, liberty-minded media. I called it before the headlines hit.

💥 Why It Matters: The Cost of Division

These riots come with a heavy price:

• Economic: Burned businesses, trashed neighborhoods—often in minority communities.
• Social: Erosion of trust in public institutions. Streets replaced by war zones.
• Political: Escalation toward militarization. When citizens expect violence, they arm up. And that spiral is hard to reverse.

But there is a better way. A libertarian path:

• Protect speech.
• Defend property.
• Empower local governance.
• Use force proportionally.

When mobs are weaponized—by government or activists—liberty dies.

🛠 What Should Be Done?

1. Enforce the Rule of Law: Riots are not free speech. Let police do their jobs without political muzzling.
2. Promote Civic Dialogue: We need a cultural reset around nonviolence and community ties.
3. Decentralize Authority: Local solutions beat federal overreach. Voluntary cooperation beats state coercion.
4. Hold Politicians Accountable: If leaders incite violence, they’re not activists—they’re accomplices.

📡 My Role: Early Warning System

That June 4th episode wasn’t just another show. It was a warning. And it came true. That’s what Disruptarian media does: we spot the trends the mainstream ignores or covers up. And when the riots started, people realized I had seen it coming. Not because I’m psychic, but because I follow the truth.

🧭 Conclusion: Reclaiming Civic Sanity

The 2025 BLM riots proved one thing: division is now a political tool. Cities burn, trust dies, and liberty retreats. But it doesn’t have to be this way. Free markets, voluntary associations, and strong property rights can rebuild what was lost.

If we want to put out these fires for good, we need to stop handing matches to politicians. The rebuilding starts with us. And I’m here to keep the fire of reason burning—not the flames of destruction.

---

Excerpt for WordPress: On June 4, 2025, I released a Disruptarian Radio episode warning of a looming Leftist explosion. Just two days later, BLM riots erupted across America. This post breaks down how radical politics weaponize division—and how liberty offers a path out.

Keywords: BLM riots, Ryan Dickie Thompson, Disruptarian Radio, 2025 protests, Leftist violence, libertarian media, political unrest, National Guard, free market solutions, Antifa riots, sanctuary cities, decentralized governance, property rights, civic division, urban chaos, Democratic policies, immigrant voters shift, law enforcement, political accountability, independent journalism

Featured Image Prompt: A split-screen image: on the left, a city in flames with masked protesters and burning cars; on the right, a microphone and liberty torch symbol representing Disruptarian Radio. Bold contrast between chaos and reason.

Sources:

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3m1Xue9phM
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter
• https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/blaming-donald-trump-for-los-angeles-riots-may-have-worked-in-the-past-but-times-have-changed

By Ryan “Dickie” Thompson | Punk Rock Libertarian

Culture doesn’t evolve in a straight line—it jerks, slams, and ricochets like a mosh pit in a dive bar. What goes up must come down, and what goes too far eventually smashes headlong into the wall of reality. That’s the story of every failed utopian ideology, from slavery to communism to the LSD-soaked escapism of the 1960s hippie movement. And now? We’re watching another cultural pendulum swing back with momentum: the collapse of the woke machine.

It turns out you can only push so far before people push back. And push back, they are.

The Cultural Whiplash is Real

Let’s get one thing straight: society has always had an ebb and flow. America once condoned slavery, then fought a bloody civil war to end it. We flirted with socialism, then recoiled in horror as Stalin’s gulags came to light. We watched the 1960s bloom with flower power, then rot under the weight of heroin, failed communes, and cultural decay.

Today’s ideology of choice is a Frankenstein monster of third-wave feminism, radical transgenderism, and a corporate-backed version of social justice that serves the elite while cannibalizing the middle class. Woke culture promised equity and liberation. What it delivered was censorship, division, and ideological tyranny.

But the punk rock spirit of rebellion never dies. And now it’s turning against the woke regime.

When “Progressivism” Becomes Regressive

Third-wave feminism once championed equality but now treats men like defective women. It went from “equal pay” to “kill all men” in less than a decade. People are waking up to the double standard—especially when comedians like Dave Chappelle, who risk everything to speak truth, call it out.

In his special Sticks and Stones, Chappelle ripped into the feminist movement with brutal honesty:

“What the f— is your agenda, ladies? Is sexism dead? No, in fact, the opposite happened. I said it was going to get worse, and they said I was tone-deaf. But eight states, including your state [Georgia], have passed the most stringent anti-abortion laws this nation has seen since Roe v. Wade.”

This isn’t a right-wing attack; it’s cultural recoil. The people who once marched for civil rights now find themselves being shouted down by blue-haired authoritarians who believe free speech is hate speech.

The Transgender Industrial Complex

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: transgender ideology. What was once a call for compassion has metastasized into a full-blown institutional power structure that targets children and silences dissent. You can’t question hormone blockers for 12-year-olds without being labeled a bigot.

Even Elon Musk’s own son transitioned—and Musk, of all people, is now openly critical of the entire apparatus. J.K. Rowling, one of the most successful authors in history, risked cancellation to say the emperor has no clothes. And she wasn’t wrong. From medical malpractice to political manipulation, the trans movement has been hijacked by ideologues.

We’re seeing a societal immune response. Parents are waking up. Doctors are defecting. People are refusing to be bullied by language police and rainbow corporatism.

The Fascist Irony of Antifa

There’s no better symbol of today’s cultural insanity than Antifa—a group supposedly fighting fascism by using fascist tactics. Intimidation, censorship, and political violence? Sounds like a brownshirt cosplay with a TikTok account.

So what happens? You get counter-movements. Enter the Proud Boys. Say what you want about them, but they didn’t emerge in a vacuum. They were a reaction. When people feel cornered and mocked by institutions, they don’t call a therapist. They call their mates.

Soros, Billionaires, and the Woke Media Matrix

This isn’t just a grassroots psychosis; it’s institutional. Billionaires like George Soros have bankrolled media outlets and prosecutors who let criminals walk free while punishing ideological dissent. Progressive candidates are backed by obscene amounts of money.

Take Kamala Harris in 2024: she had twice the funding of Donald Trump, thanks to corporate and elite donors. And while Trump was backed by wealthy allies like Elon Musk and a few others see OpenSecrets for details, the sheer volume of progressive cash was staggering.

But people see through it now. The purchase of Twitter by Musk (now X) wasn’t just a business deal. It was an act of cultural disruption. He didn’t just buy a platform—he dismantled a narrative machine.

Organic Resistance Beats Government Regulation

Here’s the beautiful thing about the United States: we have the cultural sandbox to experiment. We try things out. We make mistakes. But we learn. And most importantly, the resistance to failed ideologies doesn’t have to come from the state. It comes from the people.

The pendulum swings. When you tell people that men can get pregnant, they might nod politely at first. But give it a few years, and they’ll be at the pub, laughing at the absurdity. You don’t need federal mandates to fix culture. You need people willing to say: enough.

We’re there now. The backlash is brewing. It’s not just political; it’s spiritual. It’s philosophical. People want to return to a world that makes sense—where biology is real, comedy is uncensored, and kids are protected from ideological lunacy.

Johnny Rotten and the Punk Rock of the New Rebellion

Perhaps one of the most unexpected—and telling—moments of this cultural shift came when Johnny Rotten, aka John Lydon of the Sex Pistols, publicly came out against woke culture and in support of Donald Trump. Yes, the same Johnny Rotten who once screamed anarchy and spat in the face of the establishment is now pointing that same punk rock finger at the authoritarianism of the modern left.

He said it plain: the woke mob has become the new thought police. And he wasn’t having any of it. When a punk icon who built his career on rebellion recognizes the stench of control, it’s worth taking note. The man who once embodied chaos now sees more danger in forced political conformity than in capitalism or conservatism.

Being anti-woke isn’t just a reaction. It’s a new kind of punk rock. It means refusing to live under someone else’s moral dictatorship. It means mocking power, even when that power wears a rainbow flag and preaches tolerance while crushing dissent.

So what’s next? Culture will heal the same way it always has. Through jokes. Through music. Through rebellion. Through everyday people refusing to kneel to absurdity.

We don’t need permission to push back. We need volume. We need guts. And most of all, we need to remember that freedom isn’t granted—it’s asserted.

And assert it, we will.

---

Sources and References:

• OpenSecrets – Trump 2024 Donor Info: https://www.opensecrets.org/2024-presidential-race/donald-trump/contributors?id=N00023864
• Dave Chappelle’s “Sticks and Stones” commentary: https://medium.com/@nick.g.52/reductio-ad-absurdum-the-comedy-of-dave-chappelle-724ac1d21e9e
• Johnny Rotten’s Pro-Trump Stance (Various Reports): https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/john-lydon-donald-trump-vote-sex-pistols-b885235.html
• J.K. Rowling and gender activism backlash: https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-52983376
• Elon Musk and Twitter/X Acquisition: https://www.reuters.com/technology/elon-musk-completes-44-billion-deal-buy-twitter-2022-10-28/

---

By Ryan “Dickie” Thompson

When Elon Musk, the richest man on Earth, took to X (formerly Twitter) to directly challenge Donald Trump and his so-called “Big Beautiful Bill,” we didn’t just witness a personal feud. We witnessed the cracking foundation of America’s broken two-party system. As someone who has stood in the crossfire of cancel culture and bureaucratic overreach, I saw this for what it was: a rare, principled moment of defiance against the bipartisan disease of spending addiction.

Let’s get something straight. I’m no apologist for the Democrats. Their authoritarian tendencies, their obsession with censorship, and their total disdain for fiscal responsibility make me hope that their party dwindles into irrelevance. But let’s not pretend the GOP is our salvation. Republicans talk a good game about limited government and balanced budgets, but when it comes time to legislate, they sell out. And that’s exactly what happened with Trump’s latest spending bonanza—his so-called “Big Beautiful Bill.”

It was neither big in value nor beautiful in principle. It shredded what little work DOGE (the short-term government efficiency initiative Musk was involved in) had accomplished. DOGE found $160 billion in potential savings. Trump’s bill? It locked in only $9 billion. That’s not reform. That’s a middle finger to the taxpayers.

Musk’s backlash was immediate and sharp. He criticized the bloated bill and publicly questioned why Trump hadn’t released the Epstein files—hinting at corruption or cover-up. Trump’s response? Accusations that Elon was simply upset over losing EV tax credits. But this wasn’t about Tesla subsidies. It was about principle.

When someone like Musk is willing to risk his political alliances and corporate interests to call out waste, we should listen. Because whether you love him or hate him, Elon Musk understands one thing the GOP and DNC both refuse to acknowledge: the U.S. federal government is bleeding money like a gut-shot bull. We’re $36 trillion in debt. Our interest payments alone are approaching $1 trillion a year—roughly equal to our defense budget. That’s financial insanity.

And now, we’re seeing the consequences of speaking truth to power. Elon is being painted as erratic, ungrateful, and disloyal. But what if he’s simply the only one in the room refusing to gaslight the American people?

Trump and Musk were once aligned. Elon even donated hundreds of millions to help Trump defeat the authoritarian wing of the Democrat Party. But the honeymoon ended when Trump’s administration chose bloated spending over bold reform. And now, Elon is using his influence and platforms to ask the question most Americans are silently screaming: Why is no one cutting the damn spending?

What followed was a tsunami of engagement. Musk ran a poll asking if America needed a legitimate third party. The overwhelming answer? Yes.

This isn’t fringe anymore. It’s not a pipe dream. People across the political spectrum are waking up to the failure of the two-party stranglehold. Both Democrats and Republicans are co-opted by corporate interests, controlled by lobbyists, and governed by short-term power plays. They are not interested in solving long-term problems. They are interested in keeping their seats.

A third party, especially one powered by principled capital and backed by figures like Elon Musk, could be the most important political development in a generation. And yes, it would be disruptive. But disruption is exactly what Washington D.C. needs.

Let’s be honest: Trump isn’t wrong about everything. He revitalized manufacturing and made moves to bring jobs back to American soil. But he’s lost the plot if he thinks more bloated spending will strengthen this country. The Big Beautiful Bill is a compromise with the swamp, not a bulldozer through it.

Elon, on the other hand, has called out both sides. He’s taken flak from the authoritarian left and now the entrenched right. That kind of balance—pissing off both ends of the establishment—is often the mark of someone standing in truth.

We don’t need more bills. We need fewer. We need leaner budgets, not larger bureaucracies. We need citizen leaders, not party loyalists. We need public servants, not career politicians.

This moment—this feud—is an inflection point. It could lead to the rise of a real third party. One rooted in actual liberty, actual fiscal responsibility, and actual competence.

To the cynics who say a third party can’t win: your argument is the system. Your fear is what keeps this dysfunction alive. But if someone like Elon Musk is willing to burn political bridges to raise this banner, then it deserves attention.

It won’t be easy. And yes, a third party might split votes, confuse the political terrain, or cause short-term chaos. But short-term chaos is better than long-term rot.

As for the Epstein comment—Elon could’ve left that alone. Mud-slinging is Trump’s arena, and he thrives in it. But let’s not get distracted. The real issue is that America is in fiscal free fall, and both parties are to blame.

Elon isn’t trying to win popularity contests. He’s putting a stake in the ground. And even if I disagree with his style at times, I applaud the substance.

I voted for Trump because the Democrats were sliding into open authoritarianism. But now the GOP is back to its old tricks: spending like drunken sailors and patting themselves on the back while doing it. That’s not what I signed up for.

So if this feud leads to a new party—one funded by innovation, grounded in logic, and committed to the Constitution—count me in. I won’t choose between the lesser of two evils anymore. I choose liberty.

---

References:

• My video critique on Elon and EV cars from 8 years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ljPYgyryso
• My breakdown of Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill: /blog/title-the-big-beautiful-bill-and-the-battle-for-americas-future/
• Source video that inspired this analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zD2j3zJ5i5Y

In a world teetering between madness and manipulation, where slogans replace dialogue and tribal loyalty is demanded above truth, I walk a different road. One paved with personal scars, literary inspiration, and a fierce commitment to the sovereignty of thought. The world depicted in my recent video isn’t fiction—it’s reflection. It’s the culmination of lessons I learned not only from great authors, but from the streets I’ve walked and the digital shadows I’ve resisted.

Authors like George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Ray Bradbury, and Ayn Rand didn’t merely write stories. They warned us. They gave us maps for navigating the dystopias we were blindly building. Orwell taught us that language is the battlefield—when you can control what people are allowed to say, you control what they are able to think. Huxley showed us a society that would drown itself not in fear, but in amusement and passivity. Bradbury lit the fire of rebellion against the burning of books and the erasure of dissent. Rand, for all her divisiveness, reminded us of the inviolable value of the individual mind in the face of collectivist coercion.

Their voices echo in my work—not as idols, but as comrades in this intellectual resistance. Their warnings shaped my podcast, Disruptarian Radio. They inspired my books, “The Transparent Future” and “Echoes of Power,” which examine tyranny not as a relic of the past, but as an evolving force—creeping forward through both state and social mechanisms.

But inspiration alone doesn’t build conviction. Real understanding comes through experience. And I have walked through fire—literally and figuratively. During the Seattle riots, I watched buildings burn. Not just from my screen, but from my doorstep. Angry mobs didn’t just chant slogans—they set homes ablaze. I lived in one of those buildings. And while the flames consumed drywall and furniture, they also burned away illusions. I saw what happens when ideology trumps humanity.

In the digital realm, the same inferno rages, cloaked in polite terms like “community guidelines” or “public safety.” My content has been measurably suppressed. Not because it was violent, or even controversial, but because it didn’t conform to the orthodoxy of the moment. I was guilty of “wrong think.”

The Biden administration, in coordination with major tech platforms, has carried out a campaign of narrative enforcement that would make Orwell nod in recognition. They don’t need jackboots when they have algorithms. They don’t need book burnings when they can make your content vanish into the shadow-ban abyss.

Yet I refuse to rage in partisan lockstep. On one side, I’m told to accept that a man is a woman because the Party says so. On the other, I’m told to submit to religious doctrines that claim exclusive rights to ultimate truth. And still, I stand in the middle.

My stance is disruptarian—not because I reject all systems, but because I question all systems. My approach is gnostic, in that I seek knowledge from experience, from spirit, from reality, not from institutional decree. Show me. Let me witness, let me test, let me discern. I will not be shouted into submission by mobs in the street, nor shamed into compliance by digital Pharisees.

Truth is not a slogan. It is not a tribe. It is not a trend. It is something deeper. And it demands that we engage with it courageously, knowing it will often offend both the left and the right.

In my video, you see me walking through the wreckage—the symbolic and literal ruins of a society at war with itself. Not as a hero. Not as a savior. But as someone unafraid to walk where others demand allegiance. I carry with me the truth of my experience, the power of literature, and the grounding image of my five children—four girls and one boy—whose future I fight for.

My books are not fiction wrapped in allegory. They are blueprints for those trying to survive the information war without losing themselves. “The Transparent Future” speaks to the coming age of digital visibility where privacy is a myth and free will is compromised by predictive systems. “Echoes of Power” reaches backward and forward in time to expose the repeating rhythms of tyranny—how it whispers before it shouts, how it seduces before it enslaves.

Some say I should pick a side. But both sides, at their extremes, demand something I will never give up: my ability to think for myself.

This is not neutrality. This is rebellion. To remain anchored in reality while others choose comfort in curated fictions is the greatest act of defiance. And I will not be moved.

I make these videos. I write these books. I speak into microphones not because it’s easy, but because it’s necessary. In every era, someone must choose truth over tribe. Someone must choose principle over popularity.

That someone is me.

And if you’re still reading, perhaps it’s you too.