Advertisement: [ad_1]

In a recent episode of Sky News hosted by Danica De Giorgio, the atmosphere surrounding Donald Trump’s resurgence into the political spotlight was palpable. De Giorgio discussed how the mainstream narrative and the reactions from leftist commentators were akin to “meltdowns” following Trump’s inauguration. In a time when division and tribalism seem to dominate the political landscape, it is intriguing to observe the palpable fear among left-leaning figures as Trump reclaims prominence. It’s a potent reminder that strong leadership can provoke powerful responses—both positive and negative—across the political spectrum.

For many on the libertarian right, Trump’s policies resonate deeply. His administration, hinged on putting “America First,” appealed not only to national pride but also to individual liberty and the minimization of government overreach. De Giorgio’s remarks hint at a cultural and political shift—an optimism that contrasts starkly with the despondence expressed by the self-proclaimed “woke” left. One can’t help but take a moment to relish the “screams” from those who feel threatened by Trump‘s policies; it demonstrates the effectiveness and impact of his approach.

The initial segment of the show delved into the “Biden Extravaganza,” which was marked by a compilation of the current president’s infamous gaffes. De Giorgio adeptly described Biden as “propped up by stage mom Jill Biden,” alluding to the perception that Biden’s presidency is more about image than competence. It raises essential questions about the capabilities of leaders and the qualifications necessary to steer a nation. When juxtaposed against Trump’s often-maligned style, it becomes apparent that leadership is not solely about eloquence; it’s about results—a concept that seems to have been lost on many in the current administration.

The host’s sentiments regarding Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s refusal to attend the inauguration got to the heart of the issue. While expressing disdain for Trump, her absence signifies a deeper, more symbolic retreat of the left from mainstream American political discourse. The gap between the political elite and the general populace continues to widen, and AOC’s dramatic assertion, “I don’t celebrate rapists,” showcases the left’s penchant for hyperbole over reasoned discourse. The left is understandably uneasy as Trump takes the reins once more, prompting them to recognize their vulnerability in this new political climate.

Furthermore, the dialogue shifted towards the seemingly desperate antics of mainstream media figures such as Don Lemon, who represent a collapsing narrative in light of Trump’s return. The irony is not lost that, while Trump faces myriad legal challenges, many Democrats are proactively securing pardons for themselves and their associates. This juxtaposition of accountability and preemptive absolution speaks volumes about the state of political ethics today. The discussion hinted at the glaring question—does a preemptive pardon imply guilt? Is it not the very embodiment of hypocrisy when public figures who champion justice appear to create a self-serving escape route?

As the show continued, the chatter about Trump’s executive actions on day one of his new presidency highlighted his commitment to dismantling what many in the libertarian camp view as unnecessary governance. The overturning of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and a commitment to strict immigration policies resonate with those who believe in individual merit over identity politics. These actions indicate a necessary counterbalance to decades of progressive overreach, where feelings rather than facts have dominated policy conversations.

Moreover, De Giorgio’s analysis of Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord reflects a pivotal moment in environmental policy, where national interests are prioritized over international platitudes. The former president’s staunch assertion that the U.S. will not “sabotage [its] own Industries while China pollutes with impunity” is a direct challenge to the tenets of globalism that have long pervaded American interests. It is a win for those who feel overshadowed by the incessant drumbeat for universal adherence to often impractical environmental policies at the expense of national industries and workers.

The host’s further observations regarding the tech titans at the inauguration—their palpable shift in demeanor toward Trump—illustrate an essential truth of modern politics: the canny businessman knows how to leverage relationships. The billionaire elite’s apparent embrace of Trump at his inauguration marked a significant pivot that many did not anticipate; they have come to realize that aligning with the populist agenda is vital for their survival and success, especially given the evident pushback against the progressive policies that have at times sought to cripple their enterprises.

In this complex web of political maneuvering, much is being asked regarding Trump’s future ambitions, especially surrounded by a new generation of leaders—a figure such as Barron Trump, for example. The speculation around his potential candidacy one day shines a light on a family legacy that many are eager to witness unfold. As conversations about America’s future continue, it is critical to recognize that the changing dynamics present opportunities for a much-needed re-evaluation of what is essential in political leadership—values, principles, and the understanding that ultimately, the government exists to serve the people, not the other way around.

Overall, the atmosphere conveyed by De Giorgio on Sky News encapsulates a pivotal moment in American politics. The evolving responses to Trump‘s policies from both sides signify a larger movement—a reckoning of sorts as the populace comes to terms with its values. Those who march with the standard of limited government, personal liberty, and an America-first ethos may find themselves cheering as they tune in to the unfolding chapters of this story, eager to see if the past can illuminate the path forward. Indeed, the narrative surrounding Trump’s presidency is far from stagnant; it is alive and well, inciting both fear and admiration depending on who’s watching.

As we reflect on the current political landscape, it’s crucial to foster dialogues that prioritize individual rights and the prosperity of America through accountability, integrity, and a firm rejection of divisive identity politics. The stakes have never been higher, and with every move Trump makes, it becomes increasingly clear that the road ahead is not just about one man’s return to power—it’s about the broader implications for the soul of the nation and the very principles that underpin American democracy.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_1cPgqnFN10/hqdefault.jpg

source of this video: ‘Cue the leftie meltdowns because Donald Trump is back’: Danica De Giorgio
Advertisement: [ad_2]

Advertisement: [ad_1]

In Asheville, North Carolina, the aftermath of Hurricane Helene has left a devastating mark on the community, and President Donald Trump is addressing the ongoing struggles faced by residents. Four months following the hurricane’s impact, Asheville is still reeling from debris, toxic waste, and housing crises that have made life distressing for many of its citizens. As a libertarian who believes in personal responsibility and the power of local solutions, I can empathize with the sentiment behind Trump‘s promise for more funding and restoration efforts.

During his visit to this resilient yet battered community, President Trump pledged to secure additional resources aimed at helping residents rebound from this natural disaster. The challenges remain significant, as many homes still stand in disrepair, roads are littered with remnants of the storm, and countless families continue to grapple with the chilling reality of inadequate housing. To put it simply, the government has a role to play in supporting communities struck by calamities, but effective solutions should embody an acknowledgment of individual hardships and local dynamics.

Meteorologist Amy Metz of NEWSMAX has been following this story closely, shedding light on the specific conditions that residents are enduring. The image of waste-strewn streets and damaged homes paints a stark picture of what local citizens are facing. Some families have been living in tents during freezing temperatures that hover around the zero mark in the dead of winter. As a society, we must snap into action to address such issues, as the cold weather amplifies the vulnerability of those who have lost much in the wake of disaster.

The commitment from President Trump comes on the heels of troubling actions from FEMA, which recently fired a supervisor for instructing employees to avoid houses displaying Trump signage. Such politicization of disaster relief is a stark reminder of how bureaucratic mismanagement can impede timely assistance. Thankfully, Trump has vowed to bypass such agencies by seeking direct funding through Congress, signaling a shift toward a more efficient and responsive approach to aid.

In his inaugural speech, Trump championed a vision for a “complete restoration of America,” and now we see this vision taking on local significance in Asheville. A reallocation of resources and avoiding the usual red tape associated with federal agencies could fast-track recovery efforts for those whose lives were deeply impacted by Hurricane Helene. However, this battle is not just about addressing the aftermath of a single storm; it’s about restoring vitality to entire neighborhoods, thereby hinting at broader implications for governance.

The struggles of Asheville are echoed in other parts of the Southeastern U.S. — from Florida to parts of Tennessee — where similar damage persists. As we witness the tale of one town following a natural disaster, we can’t help but wonder how many other communities nationwide aren’t receiving the attention or assistance they desperately need. Government at all levels must adopt a more proactive and adaptable stance to disaster relief, allowing local communities to dictate their recovery processes while ensuring they get the basic support necessary for survival.

For citizens caught in the web of bureaucracy, like those who experienced the hardships of hotel stays ending abruptly while waiting for assistance, we can understand the frustration and anger over the lack of urgency in response efforts. Many residents became stranded in their next steps, with uncertainty looming over their futures while navigating the channels of federal aid. This isn’t merely a logistical issue; it’s a human one. Emphasizing community and local decision-making can lead to a more empathetic and well-informed approach that prioritizes what individuals actually need while reducing bureaucratic interference.

As we move forward, it’s essential to call for a streamlined process for restoration and relief that eliminates red tape, allowing communities such as Asheville to get back on their feet more swiftly. History has shown us time and again that local governments can often react more effectively than cumbersome federal agencies. Local leaders — not distant bureaucrats — are usually aware of the specific needs of their constituents. Hence, the call for immediate assistance and funding should be matched with an expectation for local empowerment in reconstruction efforts.

The story of Asheville is still unfolding, and there is a sense of urgency to ensure that those affected by Hurricane Helene don’t just receive temporary relief but are afforded the opportunity for true recovery. When communities can reclaim their agency and rebuild with the resources they need, it fosters resilience and ultimately strengthens the social fabric.

President Trump’s involvement creates a significant opportunity for change in Asheville. While we can debate the appropriate methods through which aid should be administered, the focus must remain steadfast: putting people first and allowing the values of freedom, individualism, and personal responsibility to guide our path forward. As citizens, we must remain vigilant and advocate for policies that prioritize local engagement, ensuring that rebuilding from natural disasters is a collaborative, positive experience for all involved.

Join NEWSMAX for continued coverage on this vital topic as we delve deeper into the ongoing struggles and triumphs in Asheville and beyond. Our commitment to real news for real people is unwavering, and together we can work toward building a brighter future for all citizens affected by tragedy.

source
Advertisement: [ad_2]

Advertisement: [ad_1]

In the realm of U.S. politics, the intersection of entertainment and presidential endorsements provides a fascinating spectacle. One such endorsement that captured the media’s attention was Kid Rock’s support for Donald Trump. As an artist synonymous with the rebellious spirit of rock and the comfort of Southern heartlands, Kid Rock represents a unique blend that resonates well among a significant part of the American populace. His endorsement brings into focus the broader dynamics of musicians’ impact on political beliefs, particularly from a libertarian, free-market perspective.

Kid Rock’s support for Donald Trump is not just about shared political idealogy but also an embodiment of certain libertarian principles. Both Trump and Kid Rock champion the ideas of minimal government interference, strong personal liberties, and a staunch advocacy for free-market principles. Trump’s policies, which focused on reducing regulatory burdens, renegotiating trade deals to favor American industry, and his broad “America First” agenda, align well with libertarian economic principles that favor market freedom and individual entrepreneurship.

Celebrity Endorsements and Political Influence

There’s something inherently powerful about a celebrity endorsement in politics. The endorsement of Donald Trump by Kid Rock is an event that brings together celebrity influence and free-market libertarian advocacy. In the free-market framework, individuals, including artists and musicians, are seen as unique entities with the liberty to express their political views and influence. Celebrity endorsements can sway public opinions and can lead to more engaged voter bases. In Kid Rock’s case, his endorsement bridges his fan base and politically conservative audiences, potentially leading to a more politically active electorate.

Critics might argue that celebrity endorsements oversimplify complex issues or reduce political debates to popularity contests. However, from a libertarian view, such endorsements are expressions of free speech and individual rights. They embody the principle that individuals should have the autonomy to support and publicize their political preferences without facing government censorship or societal overreach.

Impact on Libertarian Ideals

Kid Rock’s backing of Donald Trump can also be seen as a strategic alignment with libertarian ideals, particularly the support for lower taxes, less government spending, and deregulation — principles that Trump frequently promoted. These policies appeal to those who believe in maximizing individual freedoms and minimizing governmental control, aligning closely with the libertarian ethos that many of his supporters, including Kid Rock, find appealing.

Moreover, Trump’s presidency advocated for significant deregulation across various sectors, which resonated well with libertarians who argue that a free market without excessive regulatory constraints leads to innovation and economic growth. Kid Rock’s endorsement underscores this belief, signaling support not just for the individual policies, but for the ideological underpinnings of Trump’s economic agenda.

Potential Risks and Rewards

Endorsements from figures like Kid Rock carry their set of risks and rewards. On the positive side, they can mobilize particular demographics to become more involved in the political process, driving voter participation and promoting a politically informed citizenry. They can also open up dialogues among different community groups about pertinent political and social issues, leveraging the celebrity’s platform for broader engagement.

On the downside, these endorsements can polarize public opinion and contribute to the celebrity’s public relations risks. For a rock musician like Kid Rock, whose career is not confined to conservative circles, aligning with a controversial figure like Trump could alienate part of his fanbase. However, from a free-market perspective, such a risk is a personal investment decision that Kid Rock and any other endorsing celebrity has the right to make, emphasizing individual choice and responsibility.

Conclusion

Kid Rock’s endorsement of Donald Trump brings to light significant discussions about the interplay between free-market ideals and political alignments. It underscores the importance of personal freedom and economic liberty, principles cherished in the libertarian community. Additionally, it highlights the role of musicians and celebrities in shaping political discourse, illustrating their freedom to leverage fame for political advocacy or personal belief expression. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the influence of such endorsements will undoubtedly continue to be a topic of interest and debate among proponents and critics alike.

FAQs

1. What does Kid Rock’s endorsement of Donald Trump signify in a political context?
Kid Rock’s endorsement signifies a support for Trump’s policies that lean towards libertarian ideals of minimal governmental interference and maximum economic freedom. It also showcases the power of celebrity influence in political discourse.

2. How do celebrity endorsements impact political campaigns?
Celebrity endorsements can mobilize and engage wider audiences by bringing more attention to the endorsed candidate or cause. They can encourage greater voter turnout and foster a deeper interest in political issues among the public.

3. Do libertarian values align with Trump’s policies as endorsed by Kid Rock?
Yes, many of Trump’s policies on economic freedom, deregulation, and reduced government spending align with libertarian principles, which emphasize individual liberty and free-market capitalism.

4. Can celebrity political endorsements polarize public opinion?
Yes, celebrity endorsements can lead to polarized opinions, especially if the celebrity or the endorsed political figure has contentious or divisive viewpoints. This polarization is a natural part of democratic discourse in a society that values free expression.

To address the task you’ve provided accurately, I’d need a specific list of artists from you. As of now, I don’t have the names of the artists who are known for their political views or support for Trump. Could you please provide the list, and I’d be happy to help craft commentary around five of them, discussing their connection or support to Trump and how it has potentially influenced their careers and public perception?

#Political #Beat #Exploring #Kid #Rocks #Endorsement #Donald #Trump

the-political-beat-exploring-kid-rocks-endorsement-of-donald-trump

Advertisement: [ad_2]

Advertisement: [ad_1]

In recent days, we’ve witnessed the undeniable resurgence of certain ideologies and the rising tide of conservative viewpoints that seem to be causing quite a stir among the leftist circles in America. This phenomenon, often referred to as the “Trump effect,” has ignited both fervent celebration and dramatic meltdowns, showcasing the stark divides that persist in contemporary politics. Amid these conversations, one can’t help but acknowledge the impact of Donald Trump‘s policies—policies that many believe resonate with core libertarian ideologies such as limited government intervention, individual liberties, and an emphasis on personal responsibility.

The left’s response to Trump’s return to power has been particularly illuminating, offering a window into their mindset. Recently televised segments depicting lefties grappling with fundamental questions surrounding identity showcase their struggle while highlighting an alarming disconnect. For instance, when faced with the question, “What is a woman?” the myriad responses from self-proclaimed feminists ranged from confusing to contradictory. This ambiguity not only reveals the inconsistency in contemporary feminist thought but also underscores a potential crisis within leftist discourse itself. As they grapple with the evolving definitions of gender under the weight of progressive ideologies, one can observe a broader cultural reckoning—or perhaps a refusal to reckon—with traditional classifications that many people still hold dear.

One cannot ignore the emotional toll this has taken on certain individuals within leftist circles. Reports indicate an alarming trend of anxiety and mental breakdowns following Trump’s political victories. Demonstrators have taken to the streets, expressing devastation over what they perceive as an erosion of their rights and identity. It’s striking that many of these protests appear motivated by an intrinsic fear rather than an informed rationale. The series of public displays of anguish are revealing—not just about the individuals who participate in them, but about a cohort of Americans fundamentally unprepared to cope with the reality of a governance paradigm contrary to their beliefs.

Far from being inconsequential, these leftist meltdowns serve as a reflection of the larger cultural and ideological battles pervasive in today’s society. We see images and hear cries from those claiming that they can’t live in a country where their rights aren’t respected, which raises a critical inquiry: whose rights are being infringed upon? While emotional pleas may resonate with some, it’s evident that a significant portion of the American populace desires sensible governance that addresses critical issues like cost of living over ideological strictures. This dichotomy continues to further entrench divisions, wherein one side seems rigidly committed to abstract social theories while the other focuses on tangible improvements in daily life.

Additionally, we witness exchanges that provoke a mixture of outrage and bemusement. For instance, a notable moment involved an individual who expressed dismay over proposed immigration discussions that threatened her child’s rights but seemed entirely removed from the realities of border policies. The persistent conflation of personal fear and political discourse adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing conversations around governance and rights. It also reveals how those on the left can sometimes lose sight of the broader implications of their advocacy, becoming entangled in individual emotions rather than collective action towards pragmatic, libertarian solutions.

This is not to say that the left is devoid of valid concerns; however, their focal points often seem to obscure more fundamental issues that many Americans face daily. The media and entertainment portrayals—from comedic skits to serious news segments—also reflect this bewilderment. Instances like Don Lemon’s rambles or dramatic reactions from prominent leftist figures serve to reinforce the notion that the left struggles to maintain a coherent narrative in the face of overwhelming public sentiment that may counter their beliefs.

The responses to Trump’s policies, particularly on gender recognition, illustrate this well. Here, we see heated debates about the definition of gender, with many seemingly traumatized by the reinstatement of traditional gender norms that recognize only males and females. These reactions highlight a fundamental clash between emerging progressive ideals and widely held beliefs about gender that have persistently existed. For many, Trump‘s declaration feels like a call for sanity—a much-needed grounding in biological and historical debate. To be clear, expressing discontent over Trump’s policies doesn’t invalidate the voices of individuals who identify outside traditional gender norms; rather, it reveals the depth of societal discord that has developed around such important discussions.

Moreover, the aspect of governance and personal liberty cannot go unnoticed in this landscape. The libertarian view, aligning closely with some of Trump‘s policies, emphasizes limited government interference in personal lives, and advocates for the largest degree of freedom for the individual. When considering Trump’s approach to issues from tax reduction to immigration controls, it is evident that there is a dedicated effort to prioritize economic freedom over expansive government regulations.

Yet, as we move forward, one must ask what will happen to the legions of leftist activists who seem unable to reconcile their ideologies with the realities presented by the election. The answer may very well lie in a re-evaluation of both inner beliefs and outward expressions. For many who champion liberty, including those sympathetic to Trump’s approach, there’s hope for rational discourse, where differing viewpoints can coexist without devolving into chaos and confusion.

As the nation continues to navigate the complexities of identity, governance, and personal freedom, it is vital to engage in thoughtful dialogue and encourage a spirit of individualism that honors the need for recognition, while also fostering a society where all Americans can find a sense of belonging without the pressure of ideological conformity. In a time ripe for transformation, it is the personal connections and an understanding of differing perspectives that can pave the way for a more united future—one where diversity of thought is celebrated alongside the immutable truths of liberty and individual rights.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7NMcz6g7Ap8/hqdefault.jpg

source of this video: Massive meltdowns: Lefties lose their minds as Donald Trump returns to power
Advertisement: [ad_2]

Advertisement: [ad_1]

Rewrite this video description for the article to expand the description to at least 800 words, with the tone of a libertarian who is empathetic to Donald Trump‘s policies The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement holds a hearing titled “Restoring Immigration Enforcement in America.”
As deportation efforts ramp up under President Donald Trump, local Republican Party members say it’s a much-needed mission after an immigrant truck driver caused traffic mayhem in South Carolina earlier this month, shutting down a highway after claiming to have a bomb in his 18-wheeler.

The GOP leaders say it’s another case of former President Joe Biden’s lax immigration system affecting hardworking citizens, adding new Trump administration deportations can’t get started fast enough.

Ahmad Jamal Khamees Alhendi, 28, was stopped by state transport police Jan. 2 around 2:45 p.m. for having a missing license plate on his tractor-trailer, according to the South Carolina Department of Public Safety (SCDPS).

The 18-wheeler was eventually cleared, and all lanes of I-85 were reopened nearly five hours later.

Alhendi was arrested and jailed, and he was issued an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainer. ICE detainers are hold notices of non-citizens who could be removed from the country after being arrested for criminal activity and taken into custody.

ICE told Fox News Digital Alhendi is a Jordanian national who legally entered the United States in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Sept. 20, 2018. His address is listed as Oak Lawn, Illinois.

Alhendi has since failed to comply with the terms of his legal admittance, meaning he is now in the country illegally.

The highway shutdown, which took place near mile marker 44, led to long delays and bumper-to-bumper traffic.

President Trump is taking on defiant sanctuary cities as he seeks to fulfill a vital campaign pledge to mass deport illegal immigrants while blue city leaders dig in their heels, resisting any form of assistance to federal authorities that could lead to migrants’ removal.

Tom Homan, Trump‘s designated border czar, has promised to unveil a series of “game-changing” executive orders that have prompted sanctuary cities to cement their statuses as safe havens for migrants.

The cities, from Chicago to San Diego, have doubled down by reaffirming local ordinances to prohibit local law enforcement from assisting federal authorities in immigration removal operations.

President Trump put illegal immigration front and center in his inaugural address on Monday, promising: “All illegal entry will immediately be halted, and we will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places from which they came.”
Los Angeles, in November following Trump‘s election win, formalized policies prohibiting city resources from being used to support federal deportation efforts and further solidifying its stance as a sanctuary city.

San Diego’s board of supervisors passed a similar policy that prohibits county agencies from working with federal immigration authorities. California’s history as a shelter for migrants was cemented in 2017 after former Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation making California a sanctuary state.

During Trump‘s first term, he cut off hundreds of millions of dollars in law enforcement grants to sanctuary cities. The Biden administration restored the grants in 2021, Reuters reported.

San Diego County Supervisor Jim Desmond, a vocal critic of the state’s immigration policies, told Fox News Digital that he hopes to see “America return to the rule of law.”

“I will fight to secure our border and oppose any handouts or incentives that encourage illegal immigration,” he said. “We must put Americans first and uphold the integrity of our nation.”

Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! https://www.youtube.com/livenowfox?sub_confirmation=1
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: https://www.livenowfox.com/
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: https://twitter.com/livenowfox

Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX. also use this transcript if available for writing the article; oh my God so I did it wrong I oh my so easy let me tell IED it was like a cloud it was so light okay I’ll I’ll I’ll listen e for e e for [Applause] he two like a Twist oh [Applause] you [Applause] uh anywhere except the front row hello Che shot shotgun mik check 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 okay y [Applause] what’s your name we’re here for the semer the Federal what’s what’s thank you George okay s that halfway down and then all the way down to the whe camera okay hit the button to okay it’s halfway down it’s like this and then no it’s a really thank you than um it’s one the executive like and is like IND B how did you do it giv me oh okay no want to [Applause] so ni already [Applause] your just [Applause] oh nice we were we were just need e meet you [Music] spe get I know I know you got to out for there [Applause] show much I [Applause] pleas e committee uh uh we have uh Russell FY uh who will be joining us shortly he’s uh a member of the Judiciary Committee but this will be his first on the subcommittee on immigration he’s in his second term a former Eagle Scout and uh has his degree from the law school of South Carolina Glenn growman also a veteran of the Judiciary Committee uh served in the Wisconson State Senate uh his JD is from Wisconsin uh Brad not uh who is here as a freshman uh worked as a prosecutor with the JD from Wake Forest Bob odner who is here present um served in the Missouri State senate with a JD from St Louis University uh Derek Schmidt uh freshman from Kansas’s second district former Attorney General of the state of Kansas former Majority Leader uh of the Kansas uh uh Senate and um with the JD from Georgetown and finally Brandon Gil a freshman member from Texas uh an investment banker we welcome all of them to the subcommittee today uh our uh uh ranking yeah well our our ranking member Miss Gia Paul is absent today because of the death of her father and our hearts go out to her and her grieving family she’ll be represented today by our former chairman and ranking member of the subcommittee MS Lofgren to whom I’ll yield to introduce the new Democratic member uh well thank you Mr uh chairman we have uh now on the subcommittee Mr uh Nadler um Miss scanland Miss uh uh Crockett Mr Cohen I think they are new to the subcommittee the other members have served before and we’re looking forward to a productive year and with that I would yield back for our opening statements thank you uh the subcommittee meets today to hear testimony to assist us in uh restoring Integrity security and enforcement to our immigration laws uh and we’ll begin with opening statements um our nation has just suffered the largest illegal Mass migration in history deliberately engineered abetted and encouraged by President Joe Biden and his allies in Congress for four years the American people have endured the effect of this calculated lawlessness schools flooded with non-english-speaking students hospitals packed with illegals demanding free health care Americans pushed out of homeless shelters to make room for illegals and estimated $150 billion doll a year taken from struggling American families to pay for free food free legal services free Transportation Free Housing free clothing free cell phones for all of those who have broken into our country millions of American workers have been displaced driving down wages and drying up opportunities for our own young people the deadly fentel trade coming across our open border now claims the lives of tens of thousands of Americans every year and worst of all among these illegal migrants have come the most violent dangerous and malevolent criminals and criminal gangs in the world while Sanctuary laws and Democratic jurisdictions protect them as they prey on innocent Americans every immigration related agency in Biden’s executive branch had a part in destroying the Integrity of our immigration system I offer you just a few examples the US citizenship and Immigration Services did nothing to stop extensive fraud in Mass parole programs that it implemented and delayed adjudication of legal immigration applications in favor of those for illegal aliens the state department gave US taxpayer money to non-governmental organizations to hire foreign Nationals to tell other foreign Nationals how to circumvent US immigration laws the Department of Homeland Security refused to prevent fraud and Visa programs and brought interior immigration enforcement to a standstill Customs and Border Protection abused its Authority by paroling in over 531 th000 foreign Nationals in just one categorical parole program the Department of Health and Human Services ignored its duty to determine whether unaccompanied Alien Children who arrived at the border had criminal backgrounds and were in uh danger to themselves or others before releasing them into our country the office of refugee resettlement used taxpayer dollars to fund housing for illegal aliens the Department of Justice told its immigration judges to stop adjudicating cases and It reversed Common Sense Trump era opinions that prevented Asylum fraud time and again we were told by the Biden Administration and Congressional Democrats that our border was Secure we were told there was no National Security or public safety risk we were told the administration could do nothing more to prevent illegal immigration but Americans knew better and they finally got tired of feeling unsafe in their own towns tired of seeing illegal aliens sleeping in their Community Schools recreation centers airports and police stations and tired of footing the bills for foreign Nationals who showed nothing but contempt for us law and on November the 5th last year they delivered a resounding Victory to president Donald Trump with a clear and unambiguous mandate to stop this Insanity yesterday President Trump within hours of returning to the presidency issued 11 executive orders to once again secure our borders recover our sovereignty protect our people and restore the rule of law the wreckage of the Biden years will take many years to repair between the six million illegals deliberately trafficked into our country and another 2 million known Goda ways who evaded an utterly overwhelmed border patrol an illegal and unvetted population the size of the state of Washington has been ushered into our country that population includes at least 99 terrorists that we know of more than 1.4 million aliens who are right now defying court orders of removal 7.6 million aliens on the ice non-detained docket President Trump‘s executive orders reinstate the successful remain in Mexico program that had brought phony Asylum claims to a trickle until Joe Biden abolished it on his first day in office they revoke Biden’s anti- enforcement executive orders and policies and make clear to the world that the only pathway into the United States is to obey our laws and after the largest illegal Mass migration in history this Administration must now undertake the largest repatriation operation in history and I speak for every Republican on this committee and I believe every Republican in this Congress when I say we will stand behind him in this necessary work this Congress must not only give President Trump the tools to restore our national sovereignty but we must also enact laws so that a future Democratic president cannot once again throw our borders wide open we need to reform our Asylum laws to ensure that only legitimate claims will be honored we must close the loopholes that allowed Biden to abuse The Limited Parole Authority that Congress gave him we must revamp our unaccompanied minor laws to prevent human trafficking that ran rampant under Biden and we must rescue the hundreds of thousands of children that Biden and his administration simply lost track of we must restore Integrity to our temporary and permanent Visa program so that only those who are an asset to America can take advantage of them much of that work will fall to this subcommittee and all of that work begins today I look forward to hearing from our witnesses to help us chart that path and with that I yield to the ranking member statement uh thank you Mr chairman uh immigration to the United States has played an important role over the centuries in making America a vibrant prosperous and successful country but it is broadly agreed that our current immigration system is broken we need to make necessary reforms and then vigorously enforce the law we need to provide the resources necessary to secure the border and provide that only those who are permitted entry to the United States are in fact so admitted um the resources should include adequate Personnel technology and other tools to allow for the orderly entry of only those who secured the proper permission for entry uh but we also need to change the law to reform the law and when we look to the administration I think sometimes we should look in the mirror because the necessary reform of immigration law is a failure faure of Congress uh we have tried over the years to improve the law and in every case have failed with our immigration system broken and no longer F uh functioning as it was once intended change is necessary now I would include that from families separated due to overly punitive laws to a dysfunctional employment-based system mired in unworkable backlogs to a lengthy and overly complex uh Asylum process that has been exploited by transnational criminal organizations praying upon the desperate the immigration and nationality act screams for reform the failure to do that I believe as the chairman has indicated did lead uh to an election of someone who promised to engage in Mass deportations which I don’t believe is necessarily the answer to the challenge that we Face uh without reform of the law the executive is now uh trying to use a section of the law 212f in a way that it was probably never intended and in the in the past the courts have disallowed uh the frustration with our immigration uh border uh problem has also led the president uh to to engage in a direct attack on the Constitution uh the 14th Amendment says all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and the state wherein they reside that’s pretty clear and there’s a going back to uh the adoption of this amendment there’s never been a question uh about if you’re born here you’re an American but there’s a direct assault on that uh and the idea that this is being done in the in the uh effort to preserve Public Safety I think is bellied by the other executive action taken by the president just yesterday where the President Trump uh pardoned hundreds of felons who violently attacked police officers on January 6th decision to release violent criminals into our community makes America less safe more than 1500 criminals were pardoned including and I’ll just mention three Steve capucho who uh ripped off officer Daniel Hodes gas mask and beat him in the face while he was stuck in a door and the attack was so violent that capucho held his phone in his mouth so he could beat officer Hobbs with both hands DJ Rodriguez who joined a mob attacking officer Michael fenon and repeatedly shocked him in the neck with a taser causing him to lose Consciousness and suffer a heart attack and David Dempsey who climbed over other riers to get officers where he stomped on at least one officer’s head beat officers with a flag pole a crutch and a broken piece piece of furniture and sprayed officers faces with pepper spray don’t tell me that the motivation uh for immigration Crackdown is Public Safety when we release these violent criminals back into our communities uh Mr chairman as you know I used to teach immigration law uh and I well understand the need for reform uh but I do hope that we will require executive actions to comply with existing law and turn our attention to the necessary reforms that is really our Province here in the United States Congress and with that I yield back shair is now pleased to recognize the chairman of the house Judiciary Committee Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio thank you Mr chairman and the chairman was exactly right in his opening statement on day one of the Biden Administration they made a decision made three decisions they said we’re no longer going to build the wall we’re no longer going to have remain in Mexico and when you get to our border you will not be detained you will be released and guess what everybody came it was deliberate it was intentional it was Premed they they did it to the country and now it’s time to fix that as the chairman pointed out I mean think about it what they said was no waight no wall no detention everybody came and we we shouldn’t be surprised that who wouldn’t want to come to the greatest country ever but you got to do it legally that’s the problem and so yesterday the president started what the American people said to do on November 5th he started with those 11 executive orders that the chairman talked about and this hearing is to highlight what took place over the last four years and what we have to do to fix the problem the American people elected us to fix so I appreciate the good work our chairman has done over these last several years good work he did on hr2 the work he’s doing with this this key subcommittee on this key issue this is critically important and we’re our our our job one of our job this is with reconciliation we Republicans understand this is to make sure we have funds available to execute and get accomplished the executive orders the administration the president put in place over the last 24 hours so that’s our task and I appreciate again the work of this committee our staff and our great chairman uh of this key key sub committee with that I yield back sure now recognizes the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee Mr Jamie Rasin of Maryland for an opening statement thank you Mr chairman um the chairman began by saying the point here is to restore the rule of law restore the rule of law can you even pretend to do that if you stand by and support Donald Trump who on day one as the chairman of the committee just said day one of his presidency pardoned 1,500 insurrectionists including hundreds of people who violently assaulted and attacked American police officers let’s just take one person who is free today Julian CER who had been convicted after having having every due process protection the right to counsel the right to cross-examine Witnesses the right to introduce evidence uh but they add him completely they knew exactly what happened most of this was videotaped so the whole world could see it well Julian Kar repeatedly violently assaulted our officer protecting us in Congress officer Brian snik who then proceeded to have several strokes and died on January the 7th 2021 the next day the family of officers snik is absolutely devastated and demolished by what’s just happened I invite any of my colleagues including the members new to this committee who maybe weren’t here on January 6 and didn’t experience the trauma of that violent Insurrection when we saw a mob marauding through here yelling hang Mike Pence hang Mike Pence and looking to assassinate Nancy Pelosi and now you have the tarity to come forward and say this is about Public Safety how much safer are we now with these, 1500 criminals at large in Washington DC and going out into the country are you vouching that these are not these people are not going to be attacking any other police officers are you vouching that they’re no longer a threat to public Public Safety what an outrage what a scandal well the hearing has been called not on trying to deal with the public safety crisis created by the president on day one of his presidency but on immigration now time and again Democrats have reached across the aisle to fix our immigration system by finding common ground through compromise we did it in 1986 with a democratic Le house and a republican Le Senate when we passed the immigration reform signed into law by President Reagan four decades ago 2013 under President Obama Democrats worked the Senate Republicans on a sweeping Immigration Reform Bill only to have House Republicans kill it because it threatened Speaker Boehner’s grip on power last year under President Biden Democrats worked with Republican senator Langford to produce a tough border security deal with increased border patrol with increased border technology with increased Asylum judges at the border but President Trump and House of Republicans openly and aggressively tanked the deal they sank the ship openly rejecting a bipartisan border agreement hailed by the most conservative Republicans in the Senate because they preferred to have a security crisis to run on than an actual border solution and yet as Democrats We Stand ready again to work with our colleagues to fix the broken immigration system today unlawful Crossings at the border are much lower than they were when President Trump left office we made progress now is the time for us to T to tackle the daunting task of finding compromise and pragmatic solutions to fix the system that has not been updated in decades A system that relegates millions of people to the shadows and leaves other people in limbo let’s secure the board let’s make it a lot lot harder to get into America illegally and a lot easier to get into America lawfully that’s what America wants to see let’s not use immigration to destroy our constitution unbelievable that a lot of my friends on the other side of the aisle are sitting by idly while Donald Trump proposes by executive order to destroy section one of the 14th Amendment which establishes that everybody born in the United States is a citizen of the United States and yet they just let that go all of these originalists and textualists who claim to care about what the Constitution stands for that was the whole purpose and meaning of the 14th Amendment and now they want to destroy Birthright citizenship in America moving to a citizenship based on race instead of a citizenship based on place which was the whole purpose of the 14th Amendment to overturn The Dread Scott Decision well we’re obviously going to have some differences moving forward because they don’t want real solutions they just want to demagogue the immigration issue that doesn’t move America forward it’s just like they demagogue the issue of inflation they said they were going to bring down prices in rent in utilities energy costs they said they were going to bring down the price of groceries not a single peep from them about that on day one no it’s just about releasing all the violent insurrectionist the proud boys and the oathkeepers who are out there today saying that they want revenge that’s the real program for America but let’s hear what their specific proposals are about immigration if they make sense then we will get behind them but if it’s just more demagogy Mr chairman I’m afraid we’re going to have to let it pass thank you and I yeld back I thank the gentleman for reminding all of us why the people voted as they did on November the 5th uh the chair would now ask unanimous consent that the gentleman from Washington Mr bumgardner be permitted to sit on the dis for this hearing without objection so ordered um without objection all other opening statements will be included in the record and we’ll now introduce today’s Witnesses we have with us today no stranger to this subcommittee Mr John fabricator Mr fabor is a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation purposes of General I just wanted to confirm that the members sitting in can only ask questions if he’s yielded time isn’t that our rule okay that’s the rule thank you very much I’m sorry to interrupt uh Mr John fabricator is a visiting fellow uh at the Heritage Foundation uh and an Advisory Board member with the national Immigration Center for enforcement Mr fabricator started with the immigration and naturalization service in 1998 he retired from the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 2022 he served in many different positions including Deputy field office director for us Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the Denver Colorado area of responsibility before being promoted to field office director in 2020 U Mr Grant Newman is the director of government relations for the immigration accountability project a nonpartisan organization that analyzes current and proposed Federal immigration policies to educate the public and hold elected officials accountable to their oath and to defend the United States and its citizens Mr uh Newman has worked uh in Immigration policy since 2012 most recently at numbers USA Education and Research Foundation he received a Bachelor of Arts and political science from Christopher Newport University and his jurist Doctorate from Regent University School of Law Mr David Byer is the director of immigration studies at the KO Institute he has a ba in political science from Grove City College in Pennsylvania uh and then finally we have uh Miss Jessica vaugh she is the the director of policy studies for the center on immigration studies her area of expertise is immigration policy and operations covering topics such as unaccompanied Alien Children Visa programs immigration benefits and immigration enforcement Miss vaugh has a master’s degree from Georgetown University and a bachelor’s degree from Washington College uh in Maryland uh I want to U welcome our Witnesses thank them for appearing today we’ll Begin by swearing you in would you please rise and raise your right hand do you do you swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the testimony you’re about to give is true and correct to the best of your knowledge information and belief so help you God let the record reflect the witnesses have answered in the affirmative you may be seated please know your written testimony will be entered into the record in its entirety accordingly we ask that you summarize your testimony in five minutes and we will begin with Mr fabricator microphone micophone oh could turn on your microphone good morning chairman mlto and congresswoman lrin and distinguished members of the subcommittee thank you for the privilege of appearing before you today to discuss the urgent need to address dangerous Sanctuary jurisdictions improve interior immigration enforcement and recommit to policies that protect American citizens over the past four years the erosion of immigration enforcement has had devastating consequences for our communities Sanctuary policies the abuse of pro prosecutorial discretion and overwhelmed court dockets have created a system that Shields criminal aliens and jeopardizes Public Safety I want to emphasize one key point today weak border and immigration enforcement policies have allowed unvetted and dangerous criminal illegal aliens to enter and Thrive within our borders leaving Americans at risk such as the case involving a Venezuelan Criminal Alien who crossed illegally in El Paso Texas and was released into the US in 2023 he was charged with raping a 14-year-old girl while he was living in his employer’s basement in Colorado he had been arrested previously for possessing tools for forgery and counterfeiting and Larsen but was released without notifying ice Sanctuary jurisdictions claim to protect immigrant communities but they do the opposite they shelter criminal aliens accommodating and increasing crimes like drug trafficking violent assaults and human trafficking one Stark example is The trende aragua Gang This ENT group infiltrated Colorado where their crimes range from jewelry store robberies to deadly shootings I witnessed the aftermath firsthand in Aurora Colorado where gang members terrorized an apartment complex residents lived in fear as armed criminals roam freely culminating in horrific violence and murder despite law enforcement efforts these issues persist because Sanctuary policies actively hinder the sharing of information and cooperation with ice Sanctuary officials ignore ice detainers release violent offenders back into communities and undermine the public trust in the justice system a mother and her teenage son were killed by an illegal alien and repeat DUI offender in Colorado last December they are just one of the many tragic consequences of this leniency ice data underscores the crisis nearly 7.8 million illegal aliens are on the non-detained docket freely roam American communities including 1.4 million with final orders of removal and even 13,000 individuals convicted of murder not only that the the dismissal of 700,000 immigration cases and administrative failures in another 200,000 cases are examples of the prior administration’s opposition to enforcing immigration laws the spread of criminal networks is also alarming cartels like caloa and halisco EXP Sanctuary policies to flood our communities with fentanyl and other lethal drugs last year alone law enforcement sees more than5 million fentanyl pills yet availability remains unchanged showing that these cartels continue to operate with impunity we must return to enforcing immigration laws passed by Congress this includes one holding criminals accountable by reinstating ice detainers and ensuring dangerous individuals are detained and deported two Safeguard American families by dismantling the gangs and cartels that threaten our neighborhoods three strengthen the rule of law by fostering cooperation between ice and local law enforcement unfortunately the Biden administration’s policies eroded the effectiveness of interior enforcement this leniency sent a dangerous message encouraging illegal Crossings while undermining the tools ice needs to apprehend and remove criminal aliens the results are evident in the tragic rise of fentanyl deaths human trafficking and violent crime linked to foreign Barn cartels and gangs reversing these policies is not just an opt option it’s a necessity we must Empower ice restore cooperation with state and local enforcement and invest in the resources that prior prioritize US citizens safety and well-being members of Congress our community safety and our nation’s stability depend on decisive action your top priority right now should be delivering the resources needed to assist the Trump Administration in arresting detaining and removing illegal aliens I urge you to preempt Sanctuary policies and reinstate effective interior enforcement tools so that we can turn this Vision into reality thank you for your time and I uh I welcome any questions you have thank you for your testimony the uh chair is now pleased to recognize uh Mr Grant Newman for five minutes chairman Mento ranking member jaia paal and members of the subcommittee I’m sorry congresswoman laughren uh thank you for holding this important hearing at a pivotal moment for immigration enforcement through action and inaction the Biden Administration invited the Border crisis of the past four years and the world was listening during the first four years of the Trump Administration CBP encountered just over 3 million inadmissible aliens Nationwide by comparison of the bid Administration CBP encountered nearly 11 million inadmissible aliens in addition to implementing Mass catch and release of illegal aliens with notices to appear in report the Biden Administration illegally initiated the systematic processing of inadmissible aliens into the United States under the guise of humanitarian parole and issued them all open market employment authorization under the CH andv program more than 531 th000 otherwise inadmissible aliens from Cuba Haiti Nicaragua and Venezuela receive permission to fly over the border to American airports and disappear into the country’s interior and from border enforcement statistics it was ended Monday under the cbp1 app the administration encouraged illegal aliens to schedule their legal entry at ports over two years more than 936 th000 aliens did just that it was also ended Monday despite the law only allowing parole on a case-by Case basis for Urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit the Biden Administration granted categorical parole and work authorization to more than 1.46 million inadmissible aliens in those two parole programs alone restoring Integrity to our immigration system needs to begin with ending the rampant abuse of immigration law clear clearly parole abuse is one of the most egregious humanitarian parole cannot continue to be used by administrations to get around statutory limits all the while they claim to have made illegal immigration safe and lawful similarly endless renewals and red designations of temporary protected status have resulted in an eligible population that could exceed 1.2 million with the Biden Administration making more than 338,000 eligible in the last 9 months alone not only can illegal aliens receive TPS and work authorization we have countries that have been continuous designated since the 9s because of a hurricane despite our government claiming it’s not safe to return Nationals to TPS countries we continue to Grant non-immigrant visas with an obligation to return to Nationals from every single one of them that defies logic TPS abused must end on the border of the Romain and Mexico program significantly reduced illegal entries even though less than 68,000 aliens were sent back to Mexico over the two years it was fully implemented President Trump was has rightfully ordered its reinstatement the truth is that vast majority of illegal aliens are coming here for economic opportunities if people understand they won’t get in they won’t come if their friends family members Nos and cartels can credibly promise an easy path to be released into the United States they will come and they have perception of the enforcement of immigration law matters enormously and the statistics show that for those on the interior the credible threat of removal has the same effect if those if they believe that United States will no longer turn a Blind Eye to Illegal immigration illegal aliens will decide to return home in addition to the reinstatement of remain in Mexico the end of parole and TPS abuse and mass deportations expanding expedited removal regulations to address Asylum fraud Visa sanctions for countries that won’t take back their Nationals work s side enforcement safe Third Country agreements the broad restrictions found in the Ina can all be combined to restore Integrity to the immigration system however the American people can’t continue to endure the Whiplash every four years from administrations dramatically changing immigration enforcement and endless lawsuits Congress has plenary power over immigration and an obligation to fix it the L Lake and Riley Act is a helpful step they give State Attorneys General the better tools to respond to Lawless administrations reforming and restricting parole Asylum and the handling of unaccompanied children is essential when someone arrives at the border of illegally the executive branch should be limited to three options detain return or remove mandatory ever verify for all employers can eliminate the job magnet for illegal immigrants these Solutions were passed by Congress last year in hr2 to secure the Border Act Congress needs to finish the job additionally TPS should be reformed statutorily to prevent further abuse and endless extensions finally Congress needs to provide sufficient resources including icro officers and detention beds to carry out interior enforcement thank you and I look forward to your questions thank you we next here uh from Mr David beer chairman mcclint talk ranking member lren and distinguished members of the subcommittee thank you for the opportunity to testify for nearly half a century the KO Institute has produced original research showing that a Freer more orderly and more lawful immigration system benefits Americans unfortunately from January 2017 to January 2021 the US immigration system underwent an assault unlike any in modern history President Trump abused his authority to cut legal immigration from abroad by nearly 80% refugees by 92% he shut down Asylum even for legal crossers he stopped enforcing the law he removed requirements to Target Public Safety threats in the interior as a result he released twice as many convicted criminals as President Biden he forced us attorneys to prioritize misdemeanor family separation prosecutions of parents over sex offenders by the time President Biden took office the US immigration system was in shambles immigration courts consulates ports of Entry all shuttered even detention centers were at half capacity many border patrol agents were assigned away from the border human trafficking investigators were working on low-level Visa overstay cases in December 20120 border patrol arrests were at the highest level for any December back to 1999 evasions of border patrol were 75% higher than when President Trump entered office Border Patrol was told not to impose consequences on crossers Beyond expelling them to Mexico under title 42 of the health code a decade of progress on deterring criminals from Crossing reversed encounters with convicted criminals tripled under the Trump Administration President Trump cut legal immigration he increased illegal immigration especially by criminals after this 4year sabotage President Biden had to rebuild the immigration system from scratch I criticize Biden’s effort but the fact is that it was always going to take time to undo this absolute disaster with no help from Congress and active obstruction by the states he reprioritized Public Safety threats in the interior and cut releases of con victed criminals from detention in half he refocused on border border security doubling detention removing three times as many border crossers as President Trump but it was fixing legal immigration that contributed to ending the crisis Biden restored visa and Refugee processing to above 2016 levels Biden Biden also deregulated the parole process to open this lawful Pathway to allow Asylum seers to enter in a lawful and orderly way Biden’s approach was working yes overall Crossings increased during the economic recovery but border patrol encounters were down 33% in Biden’s final months compared to Trump‘s final months criminal Crossings had fallen 57% evasions of border patrol were down 42% falling immediately after President Biden reversed Trump‘s expulsion to Mexico policy for the first time ever most immigrants coming to the US border were applying to enter legally through a regulated and screened lawful pathway but the new Administration is already undoing all the progress the slew of new executive orders mandate violations of the US Constitution Target peaceful people over violent felons and by limiting legal immigration encourage illegal immigration the president has ordered violations of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment denying the legitimacy of millions of Americans their citizenship and threatening to deport babies born in America he is threatening to use the military to arrest detain and remove people without proving to courts they are removable his orders explicitly declare that he is above us law and he asserts he can ignore any immigration law that you members of Congress write the president may have joked he wanted to be a dictator for a day but he is not one you Congress should defend your powers and the US Constitution and our rights before they’re gone America’s immigrants are with you they come because America is the land of the free let’s keep it that way thank you thank you we’ll finally hear from Miss Jessica vaugh thank you I appreciate the chance to focus today on the most important things that Congress should do to restore immigration enforcement and integrity in our immigration laws the areas of the law that need to be updated the Border Security Act of 2023 or hr2 was a great start but more is needed to close loopholes and abuses and to fix the things in the law that just do not work and to address New Challenges I particularly want to focus on problems in certain visa and benefit programs one problem is fraud fraud is often overlooked in discussions of immigration enforcement but it really is another form of illegal immigration past reports have identified double- digigit fraud in certain benefit programs um but but most have never been studied or assessed for the prevalence of fraud Congress needs to demand some investigation into these programs Audits and and benefit fraud assessments to find out just how prevalent it is an even bigger problem is that over time our immigration law has become a massive disorganized menu of entry and work permit programs some created by Congress some not that operates almost on autopilot and in the hands of an Administration like the previous one that wanted no limits on immigration any Integrity guard rails were dismantled and these programs have now ballooned inside in some cases the rules themselves do not allow for Meaningful controls some of these programs simply need to be shut down before I talk about that um I I just want to endorse the comments made by um my fellow panelists on the need to address sanctuaries which are a major public safety threat and uh undermine the Integrity of immigration laws but I also want to mention that it’s important to allow for a role for for state and local officials in uh restoring Integrity of our immigration programs and in enforcement um uh in some of the programs that I’m going to talk about the states are really a gatekeeper to some of these programs and so they have a stake in how they are run and enforcement is not just a matter of imposing consequences on those who break the law we need to be more prudent in administering visa and green card programs to reduce opportunities for abuse either by unqualified applicants or by an Administration that opposes limits on immigration visa overstaying is a chronic problem More Than 565,000 People overstayed their Visa or VISA waiver in 20123 and the state department has done nothing but let this Pro problem get worse in the last few years um besides lenient entry programs our immigration system offers too many opportunities for people to prolong Ong their stay and obtain work permits whether through long-term pretend temporary status or in programs that are a bridged to Green cards and citizenship and I’m referring to programs like TPS opt special immigrant juvenile program and the entt Visa programs for Crime Victims all of these are Loosely regulated and attract large numbers of fraudulent and frivolous applications all of them have ballooned in size to Historic numbers of applicants in the last four years collectively these number at least a million and a half and maybe as many as two million people and that exceeds the size of all the other guest worker programs combined for example the optt programs were never authorized by Congress but allow hundreds of thousands of foreign students and foreign grads of US schools or fake schools to get a work permit the UN visas for Crime Victims have have proven most to be mostly ineffective and help prosecute crimes and need to be replaced with a a more tightly managed deferred action program that suits the needs of law enforcement agencies uh similarly the special immigrant juvenile program which was sold as a humanitarian benefit for trafficked kids in needs of protection has become an amnesty program for young adults whose claims of Abandonment or abuse are often not subject to thorough examination the availability of this benefit which has few controls or standards creates demand that gets larger and larger every year these are just a few examples of things that can be fixed by Congress and that I hope you will take up in this next session thank you I want to thank you all for your testimony we’ll now proceed to questions under the five minute Rule and we’ll begin with Mr Bigs of Arizona thank you Mr chairman it is ludicrous for the ranking member of the subcommittee to make the AR argument that millions of illegal aliens who crossed into the country during the Biden Administration invaded the country because the immigration system is quote broken close quote the fact is these individuals came because of Biden’s open border policies no offence no detention no removal and frankly no enforcement that’s what happened it is Rich to decry the pardons of President Trump yet failed to even insult discuss address places like San Diego which have just become a super Sanctuary City or the California State uh itself with its with its Sanctuary policies I submit for the record story about a sanctuary City dweller suffering sexual battery stranger rapes murders at the hands of illegal aliens in California without objection it is it is almost silly to say that the Senate plan which would have allowed 7500 people a day into the country before the president had to take any executive action at all would have been a Panacea to Biden’s failed policies and it is unique and perhaps we’re fortunate that a an individual as the ranking member of the entire Community is able to cont uh condemn pardons presidential pardons as the only person that I know of on this dis who’s actually received a presidential pardon for his actions the young uh Wong Kim Arc case which basically addressed um Birthright citizenship was given because somebody was a permanent legal resident not illegal aliens who have a child in this country when this gets to the Supreme Court they’re going to rule that way and I’ll be right unlike Mr berer who made his prediction on President Trump‘s policies when the Supreme C Court upheld his policies to say that the country’s border was in a shambles when President Trump was there is ludicrous apparently not looking at any of the numbers such as in Yuma in Yuma the entire last year the numbers were about 8600 I believe it was that was the total encounters when it was not unusual under the Biden Administration to have 8,600 Encounters in a weekend ludicrous argument specious the numbers came down why did they come down because you didn’t count people who were applying under cbp1 app you didn’t count people who were getting CH andv program so if you’re not counting everybody well of of course the numbers come down and that’s where we sit here today the law is this Mr fabricator an asylum requester is required to remain in custody until that Asylum request is adjudicated is that not true absolutely sir that’s the way it should be well not just what it should be that’s the law law is written yes sir no Administration has been successful at doing that because there’s a massive number of Asylum requests correct but under this Administration how many Asylum requesters have been released into the country too many sir they’re they’re just released into the country and not put into detention as they should be if they were actually detained by the way the law requires and which President Trump says he wants to do he wants to enforce the law what does that do to incentives to come into this country illegally it magnetizes it it it it just forces people to come in because they know they’re not going to go in to detention they know they’re going to get released into the interior of the US if you’re not detaining him that’s the that’s the magnet but if you do detain him becomes a deterrent it becomes a deterrent if we if we put detention back into action and we say we’re going to detain you when you are asking that’s going to be a deterrent if you remove people like you have 1.4 million who have active remove who are actively in the country with removal orders that doesn’t count all the 500,000 plus criminal uh individuals that’s that is just the 1.4 who’ve add due process yes if you begin removing people what does that do as a deterrent or magnet again it deters people from from coming and this the biggest problem with this is they broke into the country they entered illegally they had an opportunity to see an immigration judge that immigration judge ordered them deported and they still did not leave the United States so compounding just breaking our laws even even doubly so by not even listening to what the immigration judge had to say Thank you Mr chairman my times expired but may I put some article in for uh under unanimous consent reest yes thank you on article what Democrats must learn from Biden’s disastrous immigration record dims finally admit Biden botch border after 2024 election loss we destroyed ourselves uh this one without Title by CNN politics and then this one which I marked all over the back of I apologize for that quantifying why Democrats support open borders and I will submit additional uh uc’s without re reading them regarding Sanctuary cities and the release of violent criminals into the community I have probably 50 or more articles I will submit for the record sir without objection gentleman’s time has expired chair recognizes Miss lofgrin for five minutes thank you Mr chairman you know um I think all of us uh acknowledge that the Asylum system broke down uh the system was overwhelmed and I think it’s worth noting that a majority of those who sought a Asylum uh in Immigration Court lost their Asylum case so clearly people who are not eligible for Asylum were admitted to the United States now why is that a problem in the law section uh 208 of uh a says this this is a law that Congress wrote any alien who’s physically pres in the United States or who arrives in the United States whether or not at a designated Port of arrival and including in alien who’s brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or us Waters irrespective of such alien status May apply for Asylum that’s what the the law that we wrote and people responded to it and in such numbers uh that uh the system broke down we have never provided enough money to detain everybody who’s seeking for Asylum we we not during the first Trump Administration not during Biden and not now and so uh I think um we need to address this issue as part in addition to other elements of immigration law that are not functioning properly uh Mr Beer two 208 A1 provides this really expansive opportunity for people to come and apply broke down now Trump has tried to use 212f of the ACT basically to override the law my recollection is that when he tried that before he lost in court can you Enlighten us on that yeah that’s right uh 212f is about limiting the entry of people uh 208 a is about Asylum it’s about applying for a benefit in the United States uh for people who were already present in the country so it’s not 20 212f does not override the asylum law that you all wrote explicitly allowing people to enter regardless of of how they how they entered the country and so the the law is such that if if you come in between the ports of Entry say surreptitiously your president in the US 208a allows you to apply correct that’s right it doesn’t matter the manner or the status that you have you can apply for Asylum for one I think Congress ought to re revisit that and I think it’s very clear the syst has not worked and that we ought to have a different uh you know Asylum is important there are some people who are seeking Refuge this Asylum was adopted by all civilized countries after World War II and there is an Infamous case of Jews escaping uh Germany who were refused entry to the United States and by Canada they were sent back to Germany and most of them were killed in concentration camps and most civil ized countries adopted Asylum rules subsequent to that war that’s important but it’s important also that it’s for asiles not people who are seeking you know Economic Opportunity I I don’t dislike or hate someone seeking economic opportunities but they’re not Ayes so we need Congress itself needs to address this issue put some order so that we can have order at the border and then if we have a need for people uh who are meeting economic needs in this country there needs to be a more orderly way to deal with that as well let me just quickly ask you if you can there was an assertion that uh the 14th Amendment doesn’t mean what it says can you address the 14th Amendment question for us Mr Beer yeah so the 14th Amendment says anyone born and subject to the born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States is a US citizen and the subject to you know what the executive order says is that all of these people who are children of guest workers or children of people without legal permanent residence status or citizenship are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States which is flatly absurd that would mean they weren’t here illegally they would mean they’re not subject to US law like a diplomat who has diplomatic immunity obviously they didn’t think through the implications of making that kind of Declaration it’s totally out of line with everything uh all other Constitution interpretation uh thank you Mr Beer I my time is just about expired so I’ll yield back Mr chairman Mr Tiffany thank you Mr chairman uh Mr Beer what year was the 14th Amendment ratified in the 1860s 1868 would doesn’t that sound correct and that was after which war the Civil War which was done to end slavery would preserve the union and end slavery right correct yeah um did the uh American Immigration system become better under the Biden Administration it improved yes the immigration system in America became better during the Biden years correct Miss vaugh is a secretary of state required to Halt visas for recant countries they’re not required to um they have the authority to do that if uh they get a request from the Department of Homeland Security um to do so because a country will not take their citizens back or doesn’t cooperate in getting travel documents to return them after deportation are there countries like that that are recalcitrant yes there are um quite a few name name a couple of the worst offenders um Cuba Venezuela China uh India and Bangladesh don’t always cooperate um Iran has the state department um over the last few years done their job to stop those recalcitrant countries from dumping um criminals into our country and then not taking them back no the state department uh historically has been very reluctant to use Visa sanctions um to impose consequences on countries that are not fulfilling their International obligation to take their citizens back so should we be going to the administration and secretary Rubio and insisting that they do that or should we make a law change well I I think it would help to make a law change to say that the secretary must act in in certain situations as defined by Congress to address re recalcitrant countries and give even more tools besides Visa sanctions like potentially withholding foreign assistance or other diplomatic tools to require the secretary to do so I mean I it may be that secretary Rubio would want to do that but they are not always going to be administrations that want to in to um push this issue so if Congress changes the law then they will have that obligation you would suggest we should make it a requirement yes uh Mr Newman in regards to categorical prog uh parole uh the Mariana Islands the cnmi they have a program like that where there’s no Visa needed for people to be able to come in um isn’t that a version of Birthright citizenship yeah as I understand it’s become a major issue birth ISM in in cnmi people just basically coming in to get US citizenship so you have Chinese Nationals coming in to this territory and they’re able to um have a child there and the child becomes a citizen yeah it’s absurd it shouldn’t exist in a in a modern civilization doesn’t that seem like that could be a national security threat with all we know about communist China absolutely U Mr chairman I ask unanimous consent to enter into the record article from The Wall Street Journal December 22nd 2017 in regards to this issue without objection Mr Feb coutore um hope I got your name right there can I just some people just call you Fab don’t yes sir um so um we know all about the NOS including like the International Organization for migration iom which I saw when I was down in Panama four years ago and saw them processing people in uh don’t they get significant amount of money from the taxpayers of the United States they absolutely do sir they got a huge amount of money do do you have any idea isn’t it that tens of millions it’s tens of millions yeah higher than tens of millions and they’ve been a vital link haven’t they in this whole process of illegal immigration into America I mean we talk about the cartels and the horrible things that they do but don’t those NOS also serve as a haven’t they served as a vital link over the last four years of being able to bring people illegally into America yes sir they have they have aided in helping illegal immigration enter into the United States should we pull the money back from those organizations um that have assisted in illegal immigration yes we should pull it back and use that money to help us with our our deportation process if we’re not able to pull that money back should we reverse have them re help us reverse the flow and perhaps turn them into repatriation centers that sounds like it would be the right thing to do sir uh Mr chairman uh the America the era of America last is over as you said in your opening remarks and it’s time to enforce the laws here in the United States of America I yield back you’ll get no argument from me on that point Mr Tiffany chair now recognize Mr Rasin for five minutes thank you kindly Mr chairman Mr Beer just to be clear you’re with the KO Institute which my Republican colleagues generally love and are always quoting you and talking about you whenever we’re talking about budget or fiscal Affairs or so on they don’t like what you’re saying about immigration today and they certainly don’t like your message although I think they were completely styed and flabbergasted when you said that things had improved marginally under President Biden but had gone Way South under Donald Trump explain why immigration policy was such a nightmare in the first Trump Administration well we basically didn’t have an immigration system by the end of the Trump Administration I mean he basically Bally banned all immigration from abroad legal immigration from abroad refugees down 92% immigrant visas down 78% non-immigrant visas down 80% we basically didn’t have an immigration system available to people at the end of the Trump Administration and if you look at what happened with convicted criminals crossing the border the lack of focus on prioritization of convicted criminals in the interior yes the the the immigration system under the Trump administration led to a dis F and ultimately it took four years but the Biden Administration improved things significantly from the end of the Trump Administration so the new Trump Administration inherits a situation that’s better in terms of unlawful Crossings what is going to be the effect of all of these executive orders at this point it seems almost like they’re calculated to produce more chaos absolutely he’s trying to get rid of the legal channels by which people come into the country he got rid of the refugee program day one he got rid of the parole processes that allow people to enter legally on day one he said we’re not going to do any kind of Asylum even for people who are entering the country legally if you do that what’s the alternative it’s illegal immigration and and really as long as we have illegal immigration it’s going to be a a major touch Point politically all right so let’s say that he actually uh turns the whole country into chaos by trying to deport 12 million people as he’s promised what would the economic eff of that be and I ask because I get uh business people coming to my office all the time from the hotel sector from the construction sector from Seafood from agriculture saying there aren’t enough people to do the work now what would happen if we deported 12 million people right uh look it would be a blow to the economy similar to The Great Recession in size $2 trillion dollar blow to the GDP on an annual basis um you’re talking about a massive blow to the budget the Congressional budget office estimates that deficits will be lower by a trillion dollars as a result of the the immigrant workers that are working in the United States in these industries and look many American workers depend on the workers that we’re talking about in construction you have 2 million Americans who are working in specialized positions and as managers and supervisors of illegal immigrant workers who are doing the tough uh manual labor jobs at the low end so there’s a complimentarity between the US Workforce and The Immigrant Workforce well most violent criminals are not undocumented immigrants most undocumented immigrants are not violent criminals what would it do to our efforts to actually fight real violent crime and gun-based crime in America the AR15s the illegal trafficking guns if we diverted federal state and local law enforcement just to deporting people who’ve not committed any crimes at all look we already don’t solve 50% of murders in the United States 75% of sexual assaults go unsolved if you look at property crime it’s almost like we’re not trying we need to focus on serious uh crimes in in in this country we have a crime problem I completely agree with that but diverting state and local police in particular away from from getting Justice for victims is a terrible idea for the country well not produce safety yeah and do you think it’s a step on behalf of Law and Order to release om Mass violent criminals who attacked the US government to interrupt The Joint session of Congress and the peaceful transfer of power in America I think people who commit violent crime should have to serve their sentences and uh be punished accordingly and that was actually the position I think taken by our distinguished colleague Mr Jordan from Ohio who repeatedly distinguished between violent and nonviolent offenders I’d like to ask unanimous consent to enter in the record a CNN article in which chairman Jordan was quoted as being hesitant about the sweeping pardons um and saying that they basically should be focused on people who had committ committed nonviolent rather than violent offenses without objection um finally what should we be doing now to fix the immigration system anyone could design a better legal immigration system than the one that we actually have we need Congress to sit down and do their job and say look if we want people who come who can support themselves who can contribute to this country there’s a way to do it it’s not rocket science you can write a law that says you have to come and be able to support yourself and and uh contribute to the economy we have bills that have done this in the past we just need to pick them up and start that work again thank you you back expired uh chairman Jordan Mr Newman did the Biden Administration improve the immigration system and border security I think the stat show no I mean we’ve got a non that whole conversation just took place sound like a bunch of nonsense to me yeah same certainly 77 million Americans don’t believe what they just heard from from Mr Rasin and and and the Democrat witness Miss Miss vau did the bid Administration improved the immigration system and border security no the Biden Administration dismantled uh the the controls guard rails limits um and turned programs uh into purposes for which they were never in every Community On the Border knows they did it yeah we just had a five-minute conversation oh well things are just wonderful Joe Biden was the greatest Mr fabricator you’ve been out on the front lines you’ve dealt with this did the Biden Administration improve the immigration system and border security no we have we have more illegal alien criminals on the street today because of the Biden Administration yeah they’re they’re trying to say don’t believe your lion eyes of course we know it’s gotten worse earlier Mr uh Mr Newman you said I think you said the Biden Administration invited the crisis I think you’re being nice when you use the word invited I think they intentionally deliberately what’s my opening say willfully created the crisis and I want to know why would they do that why would an Administration deliberately create the chaos we have seen upwards of 10 million people coming in the country the these border it’s interesting these border communities that’s been the biggest change in voting Democrat to voting Republican is taken place in those communities because they have felt it firsthand we were in y Mr Bigs brought this up we were in y Arizona the cost to the education system the healthare system the Public Services in those communities unbelievable so why would they intentionally why would they do this that’s what I’ve been trying to figure out why would an Administration say we’re going to deliberately create the chaos that 77 million Americans I think all Americans know has taken place over the last four years I I can’t pretend to know the motive of the administration but what I I’m asking you to Hazard a guess as an expert in this area looking looking at what they’ve done and looking at the policies what’s very clear is that there’s been an intentional desire to get as many people into the country as possible and keep them here Mr vaugh take can you take a run at that question why would they do it I think I think all kinds of Americans asked that question why would why would our government do this to our nation because they uh don’t want any limits on immigration and because no one could stop them Mr fabricator there was a definite open border agenda at the last four years and and that is exactly the way that I see it you think there’s again haszard to guess at the motivation what do you think the motivation is well you know it it it’s it’s hard to guess at allowing so many illegal aliens to enter into the United States it’s something that when you actually look at it and you look at the numbers it’s it’s unfathomable to even think that that many people were allowed the the Goda ways the two million Goda ways that were allowed in this country that we have no idea who they are it’s it’s it’s up to me I I have no idea why they would allow that to happen I don’t get it either particularly when you think about what happens to kids on this journey when they come to C what happens to women the terrible things that take I don’t I don’t get it and for them to try to say it was wonderful and it was an improvement I don’t get that either because nobody nobody believes that I think earlier the the ranking member said as the Asylum system was overwhelmed during the Biden Administration why was it overwhelmed because they just opened everything up no wall no way uh remain in Mexico and when you get here as you pointed out in your testimony Mr fabricator you won’t be detained you’ll be released now what do we have to do to fix it Mr fabricator a guy who’s on the front lines what do we have to do to fix it number one we need to make sure that we’re giving the money to especially enforcement removal operations to go out and detain arrest detain and remove illegal aliens that that’s that’s the bottom line of what we have to do we we have to say this is a situation that we have we need to put money toward this so that we can be effective once you start repatriating once you start removing uh individuals who came here illegally that’s going to send a message that’s going to create an incentive in in a in a I think in the right way cuz right now all the incentives are the wrong way yes no wall no waight and you won’t be detained everyone comes so you got to you got to change those incentives that will that will start to do that and it absolutely will letting the men and women know of of uh of of ice of er that they have your backing and they can go out on the street and actually enforce the immigration law that’s that that’s all that they’re asking to do that’s what President Trump wants to do he wants to make sure that we go out and the immigration law is actually enforced 15 seconds Mr Newman I’ll give you the last 15 yeah it’s it’s that it’s it’s you have to fund you have to fund the resources for ice to get the job done you have to show to people in this country illegally that you could be caught and you could be sent home well this committee is committed to helping the administration have the resources to enforce the law and fix the problem I yield back to the chairman Miss cany thank you Mr chairman you know just because someone repeats fiction over and over and over again doesn’t make it true we all want an immigration system that works a border that is is secure and a country that’s safe but our immigration laws are broken and vastly outdated and underfunded for the world that we live in today and that’s an issue that Congress Cong needs to solve comprehensively and responsibly but after taking the oath of office this week the new president signed more than 200 divisive and politically motivated executive actions that don’t further that process of reforming and fixing our border or our immigration system included among those orders were several that seemed destined to create more chaos in our immigration system and at our Southern border not less because these orders aren’t Solutions but political posturing what do they do they eliminate Pathways that had been successfully lowering border crossings they reinstate failed programs of the past they make it harder to prioritize serious National Security threats for enforcement they have blocked the resettlement of Afghan allies who have been thoroughly vetted and have been waiting years for entry into this country and there’s an attempt to overturn the constitutional right to Birthright citizenship which everyone from the ACLU to the Catholic church has condemned as being both unconstitutional and inhumane for making those children stateless these actions do not make our country safer but the new president and his allies are so deep in the fiction that they have created with their own cynical narrative one that’s designed to sew chaos and anger that that they can’t acknowledge reality much less solve problems so it’s not surprising because these are the same people who blocked the bipartisan border security bill that was negotiated last year so these orders this is not new Behavior we saw it all before during the first Trump Administration when failed and inhumane immigration policies weakened our economy undermined our moral standing in the world and inflicted cruelty upon Children and Families we can never forget that the Trump in administration’s practice of family separation led by his current borders are was condemned as purposeful government torture under the Geneva Convention and other international human rights stand standards by organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics the American College of Physicians Amnesty International and faith-based leaders across the country and across the political spectrum and of course none of these fixed the issues at our border or made us more secure now Mr Beer in your statement you point out that in his first Administration the policies imposed by President Trump and his allies actually obliterated the that’s your term the immigration system and shredded enforcement um will the executive orders that we’re seeing now or the proposed policies have a different impact just because it’s a few years later no it’s going to make the problem worse because right now we have majority as I said a majority of the people who are coming to the border right now are applying to enter legally through a regulated screened lawful pathway so getting rid of that is actually going to make the problem significantly worse we didn’t have these lawful Pathways when he entered the last time so getting rid of these uh all of these legal channels getting rid of the refugee program all of these is designed to increase illegal immigration incentive say it’s sending a message around the world that the way to come to the United States is to come illegally if you shut down the legal channels and then of course that creates chaos and scenes at the border that allow someone to run again and again and again on the idea that they alone can fix it right and if you look at what happened you see the Haitians and the Cubans are a perfect example of this they for decades had entered legally Almost 100% cross the the Southwest border legally to apply for Asylum the Trump Administration came along they shut down the process to process people at ports of entry and then they crossed illegally and we created a problem where there was no problem the Biden Administration came in they corrected that mistake and now almost 100% of those groups are entering legally or at least they were until the Trump Administration took over on January 20th I I just wanted to turn to one of the current paths and we’re hearing a lot about oh you have to follow the rules you have to follow the legal path uh one of the executive orders or actions that occurred this week was to eliminate the app that was allowing immigrants to make an appointment to file a legal claim um so now we have people who’ve been waiting in Mexico for months to get their appointment and suddenly that was wiped out the general lady’s time has expired um we’ll take that as a statement uh Mr Roy thank the chairman thank you for holding this hearing thanks for the witnesses for being here uh Mr Beer a quick question um have you uh visited with or met Alexis Nong not to my knowledge you haven’t sat down and talked with Alexis Nung Alexis ner was my guest at the inauguration festivities she was my guest uh to one of the balls since she wasn’t able to attend the inauguration since it was inside Alexis’s daughter Joselyn was murdered last July her 13-year-old beautiful little girl was murdered by individuals associated with TDA dangerous gang in Venezuela who were released by this Administration this administr I should say the previous administration the Biden Administration the one we’re referring to the Biden Administration released these individuals onto the streets of Texas and now Alexis’s daughter is no longer with us Alexis chose life when she was a 14-year-old little girl Alexis is only 28 herself now I was proud to have her with me this weekend she is a testament to the greatness of this country her parents her family migrants themselves they followed the law they did it the right way because it has been possible for years to do it the right way Miss vau is it not correct that we have upwards of three million people that are put into the United States every year through visas and other programs student visas um access to being becoming an LPR Etc uh well there are more than 10 million people who come in on non-immigrant visas and even more than that come in under the Visa waiver program and um yeah it’s it’s a huge entry there is an enormous opportunity to come here legally right now correct through student visas and our normal programs of immigration more than a more than a million immigrant visas probably uh close to a million people who get temporary visas for various purposes as well we have one of the most generous immigration systems in the country 1 million green cards a million guest worker visas a million student visas does that sound correct to you well I count the student visas under the million so my point being we are the most generous country in the world by an order of magnitude and yet this Administration has been violently dis disregarding our laws to dump people in the United States through the abuse of the parole system and putting people on our streets that have led directly to the murder of American citizens and my colleagues on the other side of the diets here wonder why what happened in November happened hr2 Mr Newman do you agree that hr2 has significant reforms in it that we should adopt this Congress the hr2 that was passed in the previous Congress in the spring of 2023 absolutely that bill set out to reform Asylum laws set out to reform parole laws set out to end the abuse of Catch and Release through uh the Flores settlement and than tvpr with unaccompanied alien children did we fix a lot of those broken problems in hr2 yes would that bill of demonstrably change the ability for a Biden Administration to abuse our laws to allow them to be open and endanger the American people yes do you believe that this Congress should take up hr2 in its current form and the form that was passed in the last Congress close you know give or take take that bill up and pass it in this Congress yes do you believe that the so-called bipartisan legislation that was uh tried to uh move in the last Congress in the Senate but never passed the Senate never passed out and moved in any serious fashion do you believe that bill uh should be brought up in this Congress no not at all do you agree with me that that Bill had enormous flaws in it yes that it would have cified a lot of the releases and the broken systems under the Biden Administration that would have failed to reform Asylum yes they would have failed to reform parole yes that it would have given more money to NOS to violate our laws and ignore our borders yes in other words that bill is a joke a laughing stock do you agree absolutely um with respect to uh TDA Mr fabricator uh a congressman from the jurisdiction that I believe you ran in in Aurora Colorado tried to dismiss what was happening in apartment complexes true or false I went out and visited with you true or false TDA is active in the apartment complexes in Aurora Colorado and other places around the country it is absolutely true sir absolutely 100% true and you witnessed the danger with your own eyes I witnessed that danger I’ve been to those apartment complexes and recently more people were arrested in those apartment complexes for kidnapping and extorting other people in those apartment comp and you would agree with me that it is a scorge across our country including in Texas in my own District in San Antonio absolutely sir it is happening well we don’t have any legal Scholars I’ll come back to Birthright citizenship in the future but just suffice it to say there is significant ample evidence with what we understand about Birthright citizenship that subject to the jurisdiction thereof does not mean that you have a right to citizenship simply for being on our soil and being born on our soil we’ll talk about that in another hearing I yield back Mr chairman I have a unanimous consent request uh speaking of felons who’ve been released I seek unanimous consent to introduce the arrest warrant for Daniel Charles Bell a man who was convicted of throwing explosive devices at law enforcement during the January 6th riots uh he’s just been arrested on federal gun charges by the Trump Le Washington General recognized for a unanimous consent request request has been made and without objection granted thank you Miss Ross thank you Mr chairman and thank you to the witnesses for being here the fact is that enforcement alone will not fix our immigration system we need a comprehensive approach that balances effective enforcement with the needs of our country we must strengthen and expand lawful immigration Pathways this is a common sense solution that will ease pressure on our border and ensure that individuals seeking a better life and to improve the United States in our economy have a clear and orderly path to enter our country legally creating and enhancing a legal pathway is critical towards enhancing National Security and protecting our economy the reality is that cutting lawful Pathways only exacerbates the crisis at the border for instance the decision to end the cpb1 app which was essential to make sure that people could come with when they knew they had an appointment and we actually saw people at the border using that app when we did our codell to the southern border getting rid of it threatens to upend progress threatens chaos and it is not a solution for unlawful migration additionally we must consider the humanitarian and economic consequences of mass deportations deep reporting every undocumented immigrant in the country would destroy families devastate Industries and make our economy less secure I represent North Carolina without immigrant labor we would have no agriculture industry we would not have a food service industry many of our Tech industry Executives beg for more lawful Pathways to immigration our hospitality industry our construction industry I hear from them every single day furthermore the president’s efforts to eliminate Birthright citizenship are deeply disturbing not only does this fly in the face of the Constitution but it creates legal uncertainty for millions of children born in the United States and that chaos will overwhelm our legal system so confusion and create an underclass of stateless individuals all in violation of the Constitution as we discuss the future of immigration enforcement I urge my colleagues to consider the broader implications of these policies and work together to enact Solutions that reflect our values and our needs as a nation we can secure our border and have enough people in this country to perform essential Services Dr Byer or Mr Byer sorry I was elevating you since Congress created the Department of Homeland Security in 2003 we’ve spent approximately $49 billion dollar on immigration enforcement and tens of billions more on Border barriers and other immigration immigration enforcement related infrastructure projects despite this massive infusion of money the system is still broken can you explain why focusing on enforcement alone will not fix our broken immigration system as as long as there’s demand for labor in the United States people are going to try to come in order to fill that demand we saw it under the Trump Trump Administration the Bush Administration the Obama Administration the Clinton Administration you can go all the way back as long as there’s no legal way for them to fill jobs they’re going to come illegally and whether you could say greater or lesser extent they’re going to come and we’re going to continue to deal with this problem the most critical area is that right now for lesser skilled jobs there is no Visa no work visa at all for yearr round jobs uh not requiring a college degree so where are all the the the people who are crossing the border going they’re going into those jobs so we absolutely need to reform our legal immigration system thank you Mr chairman and I yield back Mr van Drew thank you chairman first I want to take this opportunity to thank you chairman thank you for your work that you’ve done on this issue thank you for your constant persistence and bringing it up over and over again you have made a difference on the issue a significant one and a difference in the United States of America America and I mean it I’m proud of the work you’ve done Mr bear I can’t say the same for you man I just you know I don’t even have the words and I would need an hour and a half with you one on-one alone to go through it and please for I’d be happy to anytime maybe we I we’ll take you up on that let me tell you I mean the the the things that you said to me and I mean I’m not being disrespectful because I always try to be respectful to everybody are bizarre I believe like I’m in bizar world I I just I I don’t even know where these statements come from well I got all the statistics in my statement I didn’t ask you a question sir um Mr Roy I want to associate some of the words that he said I wish you could sit in front of the families and it isn’t just like and Riley I can give you name after name after name of men and women and children who were beaten who were raped who were abused who were disfigured who were harmed and we keep overlooking that because we say well there wasn’t that many of them we don’t care about the 400 people that got into this country the best that we can tell that are on the terror watch list well it’s just not that many of them let me tell you to the mother or the father or the son or the daughter that loses somebody one is enough and to have this intellectual argument as we sit here in our comfortable chairs and our warm room where Lake and Riley for example fought for 20 minutes not to be raped and then finally was beaten so badly and her skull crushed in that she lost her life while her mother was calling her wondering where she was that’s what matters to me so you know today’s today’s theme is a simple one actions have consequences President Biden’s dozen of executive orders they crippled our border security and opened up the floodgates of the Southern border that is a fact Mr Mayor I don’t care what you say it’s a fact we see it we feel it that’s why Americans know it that’s why the election that occurred occurred Congressional Democrats refused to pass hr2 which was a good piece of legislation and the floodgates open more state and local Democratic leaders open their cities and spent billions upon billions of dollars to care for illegal IM illegal immigrants legal immigration is good when my colleagues on the other side speak about immigration let’s make sure we all understand there is a big difference between legal and illegal immigration under President Biden US Customs and Border Protection encountered and the number changes it fluctuates but it’s about 10 million inadmissible aliens from January 2021 to December 2024 that’s three times the number enountered during the Trump Administration let’s talk about the real numbers and the real facts the Biden Administration deliberately dismantled the effective protocols and tools that we had it instituted Catch and Release that had an effect it ended the construction of the wall that had an even worse effect they ended title 42 that had another bad effect and they had they ended the remain in Mexico policy which hurt us as well over and over and over again everything to open up the borders no Nation prevails with open borders and then the negligence has introduced us to Serious International and National danger nearly 400 individuals as I said on the terror watch list they’re not hypotheticals they’re real people they’re real men and women that have been hurt and you know the the gentleman good man on the other side the ranking member Mr Mr Raskin said most illegals are not violent most illegals are not violent I agree with that most are not violent they’re still breaking the law but damn it enough of them are that is scary tell all those families that most of them are not violent they don’t care about most of them come on let’s get in the real world and it’s not compassionate what my friends on the other side of the aisle are doing it hurts us and it hurts illegals it hurts children it hurts American families it hurts legal immigrants as well so I have a question for Mr fabricator I hope I pronounce your name that was the first of time to marry my wife’s family and they’re probably listening to this and I’ll get in trouble if I screwed it up I think we shouldn’t fund Sanctuary cities and Sanctuary States we’re sending Federal money over there they’re purposely breaking the law what do you think and what do you what’s the specific impact cutting off this Federal funding would have we should not fund them Sanctuary cities do not protect American citizens they only protect criminal illegal aliens thank you the gentleman’s time is thank you I Y back back uh Mr Garcia thank you uh Mr chairman and to all the witnesses today uh to No One surprise our President Trump continues again using nativist rhetoric to demonize all immigrants to scare the public now the house and the Senate have passed the bill to turn those words into devastating action so my first question for Mr Beer is this Mr Beer on January 7th tweeted that the lake and Riley act pretends to be about stopping illegal immigration who immigrants who commit crimes in fact it’s a trojan horse designed to destroy legal migration end of quote as you know the lake and Riley act permits the attorney Attorneys General to sue DHS for perceived failures in Immigration enforcement so I’d appreciate you spelling it out here what are the dangers of that section in the lake and Riley act and specifically how can it be weaponized by state officials to dismantle legal immigration look people who commit crimes are already priorities for removal they were priorities for removal under the Biden Administration their priorties for removal right now uh so there’s no difference there what’s what what is different about this act is the empowerment of States attorneys generals to go to uh courts and force the Secretary of State to stop issuing visas to countries that uh delay uh deportations uh to their to their countes so India China the largest uh uh origin countries Cuba Venezuela these are all countries that are on the list we would have to stop admitting Afghan allies from Afghanistan of course so it basically takes the The Authority away from the secretary of state Secretary of State future uh Rubio uh this case would not have the ability to make that determination it would be turned over the courts and result in a huge slash in legal immigration and really no change in interior enforcement so it really provides unprecedented powers to Attorneys General in the states over a federal matter let’s switch gears to the alien enemies act this is an executive order recently invoked by the president uh it was enacted in 1789 was designed to addressed threats during times of declared war but it’s been criticized since it was implemented in the 18th century and it continues to be invoked to strip the rights from entire groups based on their national origin for example to justify the detainment of Japanese Americans Italian German Americans during World War II or more recently Trump‘s Muslim ban President Trump signed an executive order to to use the alien enemies act to do Mass deportations without due process raising significant constitutional questions how does this align with the Fifth Amendment which guarantees due process to all individuals within the United States Mr Beer yeah so if he invokes the alien enemies act it would give him power to use the military to detain arrest and remove people without proving that they’re in the country uh illegally or are removable uh from the United States that’s an incredibly dangerous power that threatens the rights of all Americans it also could apply even to Legal permanent residents and other non-citizens who could be removed uh again we’re not subject to an invasion by a foreign government as required by the act so I don’t know where he’s going to be able to justify the use of this this Authority that was designed for cases of War thank you and in one minute I want you to comment on uh another debate going on regarding the 14th Amendment uh some argue that the framers did not consider illegal immigrants when drafting the citizenship Clause could you elaborate on your perspective regarding the 14th Amendment well if they didn’t think about illegal immigrants then they couldn’t possibly have written an exception to them uh to the general rule that anyone born in the United States is a US citizen obviously if they weren’t thinking about illegal immigrants they couldn’t have written that exception into the law and obviously it doesn’t apply uh in this case because if illegal immigrants are not subject to the laws of the United States then they’re not illegal immigrants so it’s a circular argument that makes no sense and I assume will’ll be laughed out of the courts and thus the uh absurdity of uh attempting to deny Birthright to those born in this country oh to completely absurd and it’s not even just illegal immigrants we’re talking about the CH their children also the children of legal uh residents who have who’ve been invited here by our government uh under Visa categories guest Workers International students even the uh former vice president kamla Harris uh would be potentially affected uh by this uh uh illegal and unconstitutional gentlem expired thank you Mr chairman Mr Moore thank you Mr chairman and uh I think we’ll talk more about the 14th Amendment obviously it passed right after slavery was eradicated in the United States so all those children born to the slaves were allowed to be citizens if you look at the Congressional Record when they debated that it’s pretty clear but we won’t talk about that today I uh I got you know we President Trump said yesterday in uh in his inaugural speech to rec restore common sense to America just common sense and so I’m reminded of lies and I’m going to give you the southern baptist version lies dang lies and statistics now Mr be has given us a lot of Statistics today but the reality is that 76 million people elected Donald Trump to fix the chaos that is the US Southern border right now and what I’ve seen in my communities and you’ve heard testimony in here I had a 14-year-old girl in one of my districts drugged into a bathroom and raped by nickar Ragin whoi had a prior criminal record Mr fabricator but he came here 31 years old and claimed to be a minor and we did no background checks we turned that man loose into the community and he raped a girl in a bathroom in a restaurant in wump Alabama that’s the kind of chaos that we’ve seen on the border Sheriff danels testified he came here and testified under oath that in 40 years of work in a Border Town he had never seen the Border any better than it was in 2018 and never any worse than it was when he was here just a few months ago Mr fabricor what do you think changed what changed was is it anything we did here in Congress well what changed was the Biden Administration letting in millions of people unvetted the vetting at the border was abysmal at best it was only checking for histories within the United States so if you had someone that had committed crimes in another country here you don’t have a history in this country we we did not know many people who came in we did not know what their criminal histories were allowed them to is that how a 31-year-old man claims to be a minor and comes in as an unaccompanied minor to this this country because we weren’t vetting anybody the vetting was horrible and it’s it that’s not that instance happens a lot where we have them claiming to be juveniles criminal illegal lands claiming to be juveniles because they know it will be easier to enter the United States and they probably won’t get put into detention and the Biden Administration allowed that to happen you know and Miss Von we certainly we’ve seen this across the country the the fentol deaths and and the sort of things that are happening in our communities over 100,000 kids we lost to fental death pouring across the US Southern border and when in y Arizona when we had the hearing there folks we literally had people coming across in labor they were taking them to a hospital and those ladies were delivering children in the ERS to the point that even the US citizens could not get a bed when they were in labor and delivery and the crazy one of the most astonishing things that I saw was that the hospital by federal law was required to provide them car seats and so they were running out of car seats for ladies who were having children in our hospitals while the American citizens could not get a a a labor and delivery bed that was going on under prior Administration now so I let out with President Trump said something about common sense I’m going to give you an opportunity each of you guys to tell me the one thing that you think Congress needs to do that makes Common Sense how do we fix this crisis that we have how do we fulfill the promise of securing the US Southern border and making America safe again Mr fabricator Fab I’ll let you go first thank you sir make sure ice is funded make sure enforcement removal operations has the officers necessary increase detention beds we need a massive increase in detention beds from what we have now which is around 40,000 to probably an excess of 70,000 we need to make sure that we can fund this so that we can take care of this problem today the chairman mentioned that we’re going to as this committee and as Congress we are going to make sure that we fund the president’s priorities to round people up and get them out of here Miss V uh another thing that would help a lot would be to eliminate all of the programs that allow people who’ve managed to get into the country to have their status laundered essentially into um a program a Visa program or a benefit that gives them a work permit and how do you miss V how do you launder a status that’s interesting well you apply for a program like a UVA program special immigrant juvenile or or uh TPS sometimes can be granted um even though you entered illegally you’re allowed to stay and you get a work permit and the systems are so bogged down you get this benefit even before your application has been evaluated or you’ve had a background check and many of these have a path to Citizens talking about bogging the system down folks in in y Arizona we had the testimony they were getting a cell phone $800 a month and we were turning them loose and then the phones are so we could call them to come to their court case but they would take our phones and not our calls it’s quite astonishing Mr Newman one quick Common Sense fix pass hr2 stop the loophole aded to do this you know we we passed that in the house but the Democratic control Senate would not pass it do you know that you aware of that we’ll bring it back thank you Mr chairman i y back time has expired Miss Crockett thank you so much Mr chair I am going to try to get through a lot quickly um as one of the few people sitting on the day who actually practice criminal law in the state of Texas as well as um licens and Arkansas and practice there as well as federal courts um one of the things that you said earlier Mr Beer really stuck with with me is that there are already laws on the books as it relates to those violent criminals and I know this because even though I ha from the great city of Dallas I can tell you that when someone would come in and they were being held in custody for say a crime they also had an ice hold okay and that was for those that had maybe been deported before and had reentered illegally and things like that and so no matter what type of City you’re in I do want to be clear federal law already no matter if it’s under the Biden Administration or if it’s under a republican Administration we all agree that we want to be safe and I think that’s the first premise that we’re losing because there isn’t something that is tatted on my head that says that I’m a Democrat and therefore you illegal bad person don’t come for me go for the ones that have the RS on their their forehead now now let me be clear about this as well because we’ve talked about crime and we’ve talked about fentol specific and this is also something that I have dealt with unlike some of my other colleagues and listen I’m going to be honest because I actually want to fix problems and I actually have a really good senator in Texas and I’m sure y’all can guess which one is the good one but let me tell you if we care about fentol I have multiple bills for that I started on the state level before everybody started talking about it and I have Federal bills bills that my senior senator has signed on to so I welcome my colleagues because I actually want to make sure that my communities are safe but as we start to talk about crime and statistics Mr Beer I want to play a little game with you it’s called rhetoric versus reality and so I want to ask you my first question is this rhetoric or reality immigrants commit more crimes than US citizens on a on a per capita basis rhetoric or reality oh it it is uh rhetoric okay thank you so much um Mr chair I’d like to ask for unanimous consent to enter into the record this article uh which states that undocumented immigrant offending rate lower than us-born citizen rate and this is from Ni j. OJ p.gov without objection thank you so much the next one immigrants are just living off the federal government and contribute nothing that would be rhetoric okay thank you so much Mr chair I would ask unanimous consent to enter study that says undocumented immigrants pay almost hundred billion dollar in taxes this is from the Alabama reflector without objection thank you so much my final rhetoric or reality question is immigrants only enter at the southern border rhetoric okay right because we they enter all kinds of ways I just wanted to make sure that I put that out there um in fact I have a few more questions because I still got a little bit of time which I usually run out of time um we have talked again about crime and and there’s been this overemphasis on it and honestly uh I can tell you that I don’t want anyone to be killed whether it’s here or anywhere else there is nothing about me as the child of a preacher that makes me say that I want people to die okay so I feel as if my colleagues from across the aisle have decided that they are going to make immigrants the boogeyman it’s it’s Insanity to me but they also are showing compassion for victims which they should but they have no compassion for people that are contributing to making us great in this country so interestingly enough uh I’m curious to know Mr Beer if you know if immigrants contributed to these particular crimes there was a mass shooting in Buffalo New York that killed um a number of African-Americans as they were trying to shop for groceries was the defendant an immigrant in that case do you know no he was a us-born citizen thank you so much Charleston South Charleston South Carolina there were black church gers trying to praise the Lord they were killed was that an immigrant that perpetrated that or not no that was a US born citizen thank you so much now coming home to Texas there was an an El Paso shooting do you know if that was an immigrant or not no they were targeting immigrants in that case in fact each of these cases it was white supremacist and so the last unanimous consent that I’d asked for is this article that states the white supremacist behind over 80% of extremism related us murders in 2022 without objection thank you so much G ladies time has expired Mr grman thank you uh eventually some sort of immigration bill is going to be passed this Congress we’re trying to look for some common ground Mr Beer um we’ve talked about this before in the past I’ve um introduced something called the safeguarding benefits for Americans act which prevents non-citizens from receiving we normally refer to as welfare benefits I just want to confirm that you think that would be a good idea probably improving the quality of immigrants we have coming here absolutely immigrants should be self-sufficient when they come to the United States very good well there’s maybe something we can receive bipartisan support for uh uh when we move uh an immigration Bill next thing I’d like to point out and Mr Moore’s always handled this to a degree I want to point out that in the 14th Amendment it does not say all persons born in the United States become citizens of the United States it’s all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof that amendment was passed coming out of the Civil War there’s a reason it was passed coming out of the Civil War Congress was afraid the Democrats would try to undermine the results of that war by um forbidding former slaves from voting and clearly that’s what the amendment was supposed to deal with it did not uh include anybody who just happened to show up here and have a baby and moved on um any congre Congressman at that time is could be seen from the uh the debate on the floor that time no Congressman felt that resulted in what we are now referring to as Birthright citizenship it was supposed to be limited to Slaves you did not have uh you were not subject to the jurs or you were only subject to jurisdiction there of if you were a former slave a person who came here from France and was just passing through their child would not become a citizen that should be obvious now you want to get on to a few more questions I’m going to ask these of M vaugh um uh when a child arrives at the board okay one of the heartbreaking stories you sometimes hear in this country is uh parents get divorced one parent grabs the child and flees to somewhere like Pakistan or somewhere uh the other parent is here in the United States and they can’t get that child back in other words it results in a broken family which is just horrible and I do think we have to do all we can to keep families together um in this country under the Biden Administration before that if a child shows up with one parent and they come in this country is any effort made to to see whether the local Court say the child comes here from Guatemala Cuba wherever that the local court has said that they want the Parents separate or do we just assume that the other parent would be okay with this and not seeing his child again um well if you’re referring to cases in which um the child is seeking an order of protection from say a state family court is that the scenario well let’s say there’s a divorce or at the border itself um at the border there you know families who arrive or a person who an adult who arrives with a child is not detained um if right do you think there should be do you think we should do something to make sure that we don’t have a situation like I described where one parent takes a child to Pakistan and they’re gone I mean again if a a parent shows up at the southern one parent with a child we don’t know what where the other parent is we don’t know whether that parent is the parent who shows up is fleeing the other parent trying to raise that child without a parent uh is that of concern to you well it it is because our our state family courts or are not in a position to evaluate those claims made if um the alien child for example is Seeking a special immigrant juvenile Visa seeking to stay here permanently um there’s there’s just no way they’re not held to the same standards of evidence that say an an American kid would have to to re re an order of protection so this leads to abuse you think it’d be a good idea when we pass our immigration law if we said that if a child is here with one parent uh we have to make sure legally somehow that the other parent is okay with that or it’s in accordance with the the local courts and like I said Guatemala Cuba wherever that the local courts have said it’s okay that we’re permanently breaking up the family which I think should happen very rarely um yeah that’s a tough thing for the American legal system to deal with something that happened a separation that occurred in the Home Country we wouldn’t have to deal with the system if we insisted having par here in the first place right uh Mr Cohen thank you Mr chair um M Mr Beer let me ask you somebody ask you a question about L and Ry case and you said that people who were uh criminals or conf felons were already prioritize isn’t that if they’re convicted that’s right you need a criminal conviction to be subject to mandatory detention you don’t need a criminal conviction if you are in the country illegally already and the uh Administration can go out and arrest that person even without a criminal conviction but Lake and Riley I believe was the the the bill we had that expanded that to people who were charged with charged with not convicted of Mis yeah I mean you didn’t even need an arrest to be subject to man at atory detention so there’s a difference there there there is discretion for ice to go get someone who is fleeing or evading charges but if someone has just been arrested and then they’re never charged because they didn’t commit the crime it would be wrong to subject someone to mandatory imprisonment uh in a case where they were cleared so you think there should be some priorities in in who we try to deport absolutely we need to focus on people who have violated the rights of Americans who have committed crimes and with victims those are the people that we need to seek Justice for uh not just if they’re immigrants but in general that’s what law enforcement should be focusing on even on pardons if you had people that were tried to overthrow the government in January 6th that you should go after people that were maybe beat cops up and and and and led the operation is distinguish from people that were just showed up and kind of hung out I absolutely believe that we should focus on on violent offenders and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law uh Mr is it fabricari affirmative sir yes thank you do do you agree with what Mr Beer said that we should have priorities on who we go after no sir I I I do not I I I I believe we should think daa DACA kids who’ve been in this country maybe 20 or 25 years and been good citizens maybe you know and I been in the military or National Guard or something that they should be rounded up and deported as well well the focus should be on criminals initially but if you’re violating the immigration law you violated the immigration law you violated laws of the United States and and at some point in time that needs to come to a reckoning we don’t have enough Monies to put into this to deport everybody that’s in that category right I I I would ask that you would fund that sir as Congress well if we fund it we’d probably have to cut out lots of basic programs we’ve got now it’s a tremendous amount of money billions and billions of dollars I don’t I don’t put a cost on United States citizens lives sir okay um maybe we get Elon to pay for it um the uh election’s over and we need to find Common Ground the the bill that the Senate P was proposing uh how many Republicans were for that bill or voted for it I I don’t remember could be a couple could be 15 or 16 couldn’t it I don’t I don’t have the answer to that well I think it was closer to 15 or 16 I don’t recall exactly but there were quite a few what did that bill do that was good and what we should take up now and what what was in the Bill of anything that you think was bad well I I certainly think that one of the most important uh reforms in that legislation was that if someone is released from from us custody they’re able to seek a work authorization and support themselves what we saw in New York and it’s pointed to repeatedly about these people who are living in hotel rooms and a burden on the community it’s because they’re unable to work to support themselves because they’re told you’re not supposed to work you have to wait uh 6 months to get your work permit uh through the Asylum process so if the government is not going to remove someone is they’re going to release them uh unless they’ve you know committed some serious crime or there’s some other aggravating circumstance they should be supporting themselves and contributing to the community so that’s one important thing that it it did um it it it made some uh important reforms to the legal immigration process uh as well increase in Green Card caps for the first time since 1990 that’s how old our legal immigration system is the overall framework of uh the legal immigration system needs to be reformed this was a modest step in the right direction what we need is legislation that is thought out not just common sense but logical and thought out and planned not where somebody might just say what are we going to do with all these January 6 people well it’s going to take some time time have to take some processes so just eff it just do them all that’s a Manchild we don’t need a Manchild in charge of our government or making policy because that makes for mistakes that makes for the guy who came up with the the uh Silk Road and be the biggest drug dealer in the world to get a pardon needs to stop and our immigration laws ought to be done in a logical Manner and with priorities I yield back the balance of my time gentleman’s time has expired Mr Fry thank thank you Mr chairman for having this hearing I think it’s really appropriate as we begin this Congress that we start uh with the issue that was settled in November and why the American people chose uh overwhelmingly Donald Trump to be our 47th president um I’m a little perplexed though Mr Beer about a statement that you made that Joe Biden made the border and the immigration system better nobody believes that people in their communities and I’m not going to ask you a question about this but nobody believes that and in fact behind me the numbers don’t lie sir look at the hike under the Biden administration of illegal migrants coming into this country and he fixed the problem or made it better I don’t think so and I would also remind you and and for people watching back home um that it didn’t get better in fact in in September of last year chairman green of the homeland security uh committee uh released um a press release talking about a letter that they received from Ice that nearly 650,000 criminal ille illegal aliens were currently in Isis non-detained docket roaming free in the community that means that they were picked up processed had their criminal backgrounds uh obtained by the US government and released into the interior of this country 15,000 homicides 20,000 sexual assaults assaults over 100,000 burglary larsy and robbery 60,000 traffic offenses 126,000 kidnappings 3500 the list goes on and so nobody actually believes sir that the IM migration system got better under Joe Biden so real quick Mr fabricator Mr Newman and Miss vaugh I’m going to go down the line here and ask a couple of a couple questions when Joe Biden terminated the ROM remain and Mexico policy did that lead to a decrease in illegal immigration sir no it did not sir Miss vongh no Mr Newman no when Joe Biden halted construction of the border wall on day one of his uh Administration did that lead to a decrease in illegal immigration in this country Mr Fagor it did not decrease illegal No Sir Mr Newman no when he terminated the Asylum Cooperative agreements with Guatemala Guatemala El Salvador and Honduras did that lead to a decrease in illegal immigration no no no when he bastardized Parole Authority and changed the law himself did that lead to a decrease in illegal immigration no sir no got worse I think the answers are pretty clear in fact when we went to Yuma Arizona and met with the community and saw firsthand of course the Democrats didn’t even show up to work they wouldn’t go down there with us it was an actual Judiciary Committee hearing field Hearing in Yuma and they didn’t come but we would hear from the people there the stress on the Health Care System the stress at the border the stress on the families you couldn’t even get a hospital room if you needed to have a child or if you broke your leg those are the people who were impacted of course we see this all in our community so let’s fast forward to today President Trump with his executive orders reinstated the remain and Mexico policy will that lead to a decrease in illegal immigration yes sir Miss vaugh I believe so yes absolutely will completing construction of the border wall and funding our immigration uh Services down there will that lead to a decrease in illegal immigration it will help decrease IL illegal immigration this far as long as there are no policies to undermine the deterrence that’s a key Point yes ma’am it’s a key tool to help will designating cartels and gangs as Forest foreign terrorist organizations lead to a decrease in il legal immigration yes I hope so yeah I hope so will terminating categor categorical parole programs lead to a decrease in illegal immigration absolutely will definitely yes Mr nman will terminating the use of the cbp1 app which I think uh was described by somebody on this committee as the Disney fast TK for illegal immigration will that lead to a decrease in illegal immigration it will it was full of fraud yes yeah so I think that the pretty clear and I think the next steps obviously they are the part one of this are the executive orders part two what Congress can do so Mr fabricator just for perspective uh you served at ice during the Trump Administration um and and part of the Biden Harris Administration how would you describe the differences between the two administrations very briefly um in enforcement of a legal uh enforcement uh under both administrations it was night and day President Trump wanted to enforce was exactly in the the Ina while President Biden the minute that he came into office it was a change into we are not enforcing these laws were opening this border he wanted a 100 day moratorium on deportations the first day when he was in office Miss Miss Von final question for you what steps can we take to make sure that future administrations like the Biden Administration don’t under mind the actual law or twist policies um that we can have a permanent fix to this problem um in addition to funding immigration enforcement um to um rewrite the rules on some of these programs and discretionary authorities to give out work permits and categorical parole or attempt categorical role and also I think to get better control and restore Integrity to our legal immigration system um because that you know when people know that there are loopholes that exist they come to try to take advantage of them close the loopholes well said and I yield back thank you Mr Nadler uh Mr chairman the Flor of executive order signed by President Trump on Monday promised little more than the chaos and cruelty we became accustomed to in his first term his radical anti-immigration agenda will separate families decimate our economy and strike fear in our communities with the stroke of a pen he has revived the harsh and inhumane policies of his previous administration such as the Romanian Mexico program eliminated enforcement priorities sharply reduced the availability of humanitarian parole begun dismantling the refugee program and launched a breathtaking a assault on the Constitution by attempting to end Birthright citizenship but the Trump administration’s policy of mass deportation and destroying legal Pathways wrapped as always in a blanket of hateful rhetoric will not fix our broken immigration system it will only make it harder to reach the bipartisan comprehensive solutions that are so desperately needed Mr Beer thank you for being here today Republicans are using this hearing to lay the foundation for their own anti-immigration agenda so I want to start with some important facts about the state of the Border today one when President Biden left office earlier this week where unauthorized Crossings higher or lower than they were when President Trump left office they were much lower significantly lower about 33% lower than when President Trump left office thank you what about evasions of border patrol officers were they hire at the end of President Trump‘s first term or President Biden’s there were 42% lower at the end of Biden’s term than at the end of Trump‘s and Trump‘s increased evasions over the course of his four years and isn’t it true that unlawful encounters at the border were trending upwards long before President Biden took office every month after April 2020 it increased he keeps pointing to April 2020 when uh the pandemic started and unemployment spiked uh but every month after that we saw increases in uh illegal immigration and border crossings and evasions of of border patrol thank you I want to turn now to the executive order that reports to end Birthright citizenship this executive order prevents the children of immigrants both those whose parents have a lawful immigration status like a work visa and those whose parents are undocumented who are born in the United States from being able to obtain documents to demonstrate that they are citizens of the United States can you please talk about how this would work in practice the sort of chaos that will ensue if this orders actually allowed to go forward oh absolutely this is going to apply to every single American uh child born in in the United States you will have to approve the status and and and uh citizenship every child not just those of undocumented exactly every I my my family is going to go through this in a few months we’re going to have to prove the the citizenship uh of the the parents of the child of course we can do that um but if you don’t have a passport according to this order you’re you don’t have proof of citizenship your birth certificate isn’t enough uh and so you will have to go through the rabbit hole I’ll have to prove my uh parents citizenship and and uh paperwork I mean this is the insanity of this uh order from an administrative perspective it’s going to burden every single American it’s going to call into question all of our citizenship and uh looking forward it’s going to create a lot of people who are in stateless situations where they don’t have citizenship of any country and can uh be sub subject to removal even though they were born here they grew up here they are Americans This is an attack on Americans and our rights let’s take a specific example of the impact this executive order could have the extensive green card backlogs for high-skilled workers mean that H1B Visa holders must wait decades and even centuries before a green card is available to them right now if both parents have H1B status a child was born abroad but who has lived in the United States for nearly their entire lives must leave the country when they turn 21 unless un they have their own immigration status that’s bad enough that under this executive order even children born in the US to such parents might have to self Deport because they would be denied citizenship at Birth Mr Beer does it make sense to send children who are born in the United States to countries that they don’t know may never have been to and where they have no support network no it absolutely does not it makes the country weaker it discourages legal immigration it discourages high-skilled immigration look and I talked to a lot of high-skilled immigrants in this in this country they talk about their family they talk about the hope they have for their children to be Americans to grow up in this country and to contribute to this country and and we should want them here we should want to encourage uh them to stay and one of the greatest things the United States has ever done is had Birthright citizenship because it encourages assimilation everyone who’s born here knows I’m an American I can participate in our democracy and contribute to this country contrary to the president that only one country has Birthright citizenship 33 do I yield back Mr Hunt than you Mr chairman Biden attempted to reimagine immigration in America Biden wanted you to think that it was normal to live in an America with open borders to live in an America with Sanctuary cities to fly 30,000 people per month from Cuba Haiti Nicaragua and Venezuela into America on commercial flights to turn temporary protected status into a permanent protected status that is not normal it is not constitutional and now thank God it’s over do you want to know what is normal President Trump‘s policies are normal and he’s back and he is here to help within hours of Trump‘s taking office President Trump deleted the cbp1 app reformed the parole program and placed a real borders are Tom homman in charge he is a serious man Trump also signed a flurry of executive orders restoring normal border security and immigration standards to this great nation again thank God he’s back when Trump got elected we knew that the liberal media would we knew exactly what they would do because they do the same thing during the previous Trump Administration we knew that they would attempt to pull our heartstrings to shame us into changing our standard immigration laws and in fact on the day that President Trump got inaugurated the liberal media posted a story of a woman crying when her cbp1 app appointment was cancelled that tactic is not going to work this time because we have seen firsthand for the last four years the devastating effects that Biden’s border policies have had on all Americans and while I empathize with everyone who wants to come to America because again we know this is the greatest place in the world this compassion is misplaced as it usually is with the left the woman’s tears that I care the most about are the mothers of Lincoln Riley Joselyn Nung and Rachel Moren Lincoln Riley was killed by an illegal alien while out on a jog it should be known that her killer committed a crime in another American city but he was released because that City you guessed it was a sanctuary City Joselyn while on her way to a convenience store was killed by two illegal aliens who entered through the southern border just a few months earlier by the time these illegal aliens at the time these illegal aliens were still wearing their us issued ankle tracking monitors when they killed her Miss Moren a young mother of five children was hiking on a Maryland Trail when illegal alien attacked and killed her and I could sadly name many more circum ances just like this I don’t know about other countries but in America our daughters and I have two of them should be able to go for a jog and a run to or to a convenience store without the fear of an illegal alien killing them that goes for all of our children in this nation I serve this country to protect my children and our sons and daughters Mr Mr fcor thank you so much for being here as always you’re one of my favorites one of the executive orders that President Trump has enacted so far of them which one do you think is going to be the most helpful and why well I I I you know number one I think all the executive orders that that he’s putting through are are going to be uh you know they’re they’re needed it’s there’s you know there’s a reason why why he did it but securing our border number one uh making sure that CBP app is is no longer being used so that there’s fraud uh coming into this this country I I I I I think overall everything that President Trump is trying to do for the border is for the right reason the number one priority should be protecting American citizens and I I I think that that was the goal uh of President Trump thank you um Miss vaugh given these last few executive ords as well I like you like like your take on that and do you think it is going to improve our border and our immigration status or is it going to hurt our our immigration status set of curiosity oh the the set of executive orders are are definitely Ely going to improve our immigration status um especially the one that rescinded the Biden orders um I especially look forward to the one that is going to um increase state and local Partnerships with Federal authorities um to to work on this common Mission thank you ma’am I’ll L with this do not allow the left to Gaslight you secure borders are normal I have someone has deployed all over the world every other country would never behave and allow 20 million people to enter their country illegally that’s not normal so thank God we’re going to get back to normaly and thank you all for Le for leading our charge I you back to the remainder of my time thank you Mr not thank you Mr chairman Witnesses thank you for being here um before I ask any questions let me state from a firstperson perspective that I had the privilege of serving under both the Biden and the Trump administrations I was a Federal prosecutor who who focused exclusively on organized crime and the idea that both administrations were committed to applying the law as it relates to both organized crime and specifically how illegal immigration infested organized crime is laughable it’s demonstrably not true on day one of the Biden’s Department of Justice in 2021 prosecutors that I worked with who had been excluded exclusively assigned to Prosecuting illegal re-entries and immigration offenses those individuals were either reassigned or let go many of them are no longer with the Department of Justice in this track when you look at the number of illegal re-entries so these are people who were removed after having been convicted of a crime and then come back a second time the number of those prosecutions the number of those sentences and convictions decreased precipitously under the Biden Administration despite millions and millions of more illegal crossers secondly this bureaucratic and administrative effect that I saw from the prosecutor side it applied equally to the law enforcement side I’m sure you know sir from your your contact with the border patrol with DEA with ATF and other federal law enforcement that these bureaucratic hurdles made it very difficult to investigate to prosecute to even submit cases that dealt with illegal immigration for whatever reason it was flatly deprioritized in terms of a law enforcement mechanism that the Department of Justice was unable to bring these cases to the grand jury to charge them and to work them over the last four years now I want to go and ask uh a few questions Miss vau you’ve specifically mentioned just now that there were very little disincentivizing illegal immigration can you expand can you expand on that just broadly speaking were there any disincentives to any person who wanted to cross illegally into the United States over the last four years uh no people understood that if they could make it to the US border that they almost certainly were going to be released into the country um possibly issued a work permit and and would not expect uh any threat of removal or Consequences for their illegal entry for the foreseeable future Mr Newman were there any disincentives that you saw over the last four years implemented by the B Administration specifically to disincentivize Illegal immigration no no not many at all uh as as Jessica just men Mrs Von just mentioned the the getting parole like those are obvious incentives to coming in but also as as was mentioned before deprioritizing illegal immigration crimes meant people knew they could just come in and and basically vanish into the country and they did that’s why we have more illegal aliens in the country now than we did four years ago and isn’t it true sir that the uh that the Border does have vast swats of the mileage that were unsupervised by order by the border patrol and that emanated from Washington obviously but it was implemented with huge holes in the Border yes and so therefore it’s entirely foreseeable that tens of tens of thousands hundreds of thousands even Millions potentially could have come across the border without contact yes Miss Von I want to talk to you about uh how the cartels exploited these loopholes over the last four years the price of drugs in many respects have gone down precipitously that’s an increase of Supply I saw this in my job how have cartels exploited the open border the last four years well they’ve reaped enormous revenue from it something like 13 billion doll a year that’s just known by the way right yes um they have enticed migrants um because you know they they could confidently assure their customers that they would succeed in getting into the US and then often they hooked them up in um with jobs um and told them that they would have to pay off the remainder of their smuggling fee um by giving back some of the wages that they were earning you know all determined by the cartel pay for housing Transportation food all kinds of other um expenses they have and what was a debt bondage or labor trafficking situation that’s that’s how they took advantage of these people and that’s still going on right now oh absolutely that infrastructure is in place yes correct yes um and that leads to more or less dangerous crime oh more more and more more or less gang violence one of the ways that they can get people to pay off their debt is to uh participate in drug traffic more or less overdose deaths more and Sir briefly can you describe the impact on local non-federal law enforcement that these open border policies have had it it’s it’s made it so it’s very hard for local law enforcement to respond to anything they’re they’re focused on so many more additional crimes when n and Institute says that illegal immigrants commit half less than than US citizens it doesn’t matter how much they they’re committing it’s adding to what local law enforcement has to respond to gentleman’s time has expired yes sir Mr UD thank you Mr thank you Mr chairman um today I do have some questions but at first I wanted to address some absurdities to which this committee was treated today uh first we have the absurdity from ranking member Rasin that somehow the 2024 Senate immigration bill was the solution to our border crisis um this No One Believes that it failed because it was a lousy bill it was an amnesty bill in fact it was such a bad Bill that it failed to pass somehow the idea that House Republicans are responsible for its demise is absurd because it failed in the Senate 43 to 50 including six Democrats voting no meanwhile the Senate Democrats refused to take up a real border security Bill hr2 secondly the absurdity that somehow somehow anchor babies should have Birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment and yes I said it anchor babies because that is the appropriate term these babies serve as as anchors to prevent deportation of illegal aliens as was said earlier the 14th Amendment involved slaves after the Civil War to prevent Democrat Southerners from depriving those freed slaves of their civil rights and this idea of Birthright citizenship for anchor babies was invented out of whole cloth in a footnote dicta not even the actual decision by Justice Brandon in 1982 so I applaud President Trump for that executive order and then finally the absurdity that somehow things were better under President Biden than under President Trump you know I think it’s nice that our libertarian friends at Ko remind us that illegal aliens pay some taxes that’s nice but I would also remind that the great libertarian Economist Milton Friedman once famously said you cannot have a welfare state and open borders those illegal aliens cost us in health care expenses and education expenses and of course in social welfare uh expenses and devastate those programs um Mr fabricator um I’m a medical doctor I practiced medicine for 30 years in the early years of my practice we worried a lot about drugs in terms of overprescription of Narcotics by physicians and we worried about meth dealers making methamphetamine out of pseudophed and often in rural areas today though we have 100,000 deaths from fentanyl the great major majority of it crossing our Southern border and then and a lot of people forget this 50,000 deaths from methampetamine it’s not made in a trailer in mural Missouri anymore it’s made in Mexico and comes across our Southern border Could you um this is kind of a follow-up question the question representative not not asked um Miss vau um how how how has our porest border contributed to the drug problem in the United States yeah look the cartel is all about profit so so if can make a profit in the United States they’re going to make sure that that they do so with with with the fentel that we’ve had coming in it it’s been a boon to the cartels it’s been a Bo they don’t care that a 100,000 United States citizens are dying every year that’s a cost of business to them and we should be going after the cartels for poisoning our United States citizens we’re losing a 100,000 people a year just off this one drug and we’ve done nothing about it these last four years well I think that’s going to stop now and we’re going to go Direct ly after the cartels for killing our United States citizens the cartel leaders are terrorists I think Trump‘s executive order makes them eligible for the solumani treatment um Miss vaugh I uh I I you you I think touched most on the idea of Visa abuse in my district in Missouri a an illegal alien once while driving an Uber once while driving ayt sexually assaulted two young women in my district now he was a a a tourist visa overstayer is there anything we can do to crack down on the the this very common uh source of um of illegal immigration which is coming legally but then overstaying a Visa yes there are a number of things not one Silver Bullet but you know if we take away the ability of people to work here um that’s a disincentive to overstay but we can also um lean on the state department or enact requirements for them to adjust their visa issuance protocols um to um address High overstay rates and um ice needs to do more enforcement on overstays frankly and I would also like to see um a way to hold the sponsors of uh some of these Visa holders responsible for too much overstaying thank you time has expired Mr Schmidt thank chairman and thank you for conducting this hearing to kick off this Congress there is no more important subject than the security of our nation and of moving away from these horrific policies that have abandoned that security in the name of political correctness or in the name of some sort of social engineering or in the name of political expediency I’ve been listening to this discussion today uh and it strikes me that uh perhaps Washington does what so many Americans thinks Washington uh can do which is talk ceaselessly about things that have little connection to their actual lives uh over the past 12 years I led a state law enforcement agency in my home state of Kansas I’ve been thinking on this dis about cases we actually worked uh thinking about a case in which a young man I think he was 26 uh was running drugs for the cartels he was driving North on a US Highway he was stopped by an Oklahoma law enforcement officer he panicked he shot the officer in the head by the grace of God the officer is still alive to this day uh he then came across the border where our officer stopped his vehicle with Stop Sticks he fled on foot he carjacked the vehicle of an old man in the middle of the night he fled in a high highspeed Pursuit up Highway in Kansas he realized he was going to be caught he pulled over to the side of the highway he invaded a home by the grace of God nobody was home he then shot at our officers and I had a lengthy discussion with my counterpart in Oklahoma over who got to prosecu him first we both sent him to prison for the rest of his life under our respective state laws I’m thinking about a case uh in Johnson County Kansas we in illegal alien in this country was drunk one night and he struck and killed a sheriff’s deputy who had done nothing but his job he’ pulled over a citizen who was driving erratically uh on the side of the highway and the drunken driver who never should have been in this country killed that young man I attended his funeral I’m thinking about a case in a very small county in North Central Kansas where an illegal alien came to this country raped a child and we sent him to prison for the rest of his life under the laws of the state of Kansas not because he was an illegal alien but because he raped a child in our state I’m thinking about a case in northwest Kansas where an legal alien came in in a very small County and murdered his domestic partner we sent him to prison for the rest of his life I’m thinking about a case in southwest Kansas where the same thing happened and legal alien joined up with some some lawful present citizens stole a car and then decided to kill the witness uh and we wound up sending that individual to prison for the rest of his life and that’s just the cases I can think of sitting here that we handled at a state level in a state where the vast majority of criminal activity is handled by local authorities not by the state of Kansas think of the volume that we’re talking about here and how offensive it is to those victims and their families to say statistically uh illegal aliens don’t kill people at a higher rate than anybody who actually lives here give me a break so I have a couple of questions for you I’d like to know um obviously we’ve talked a great deal about how enforcement priorities and policy priorities in this town affect uh cooperation and interactive out in the real world where federal law enforcement actually work with state law enforcement and they’re not getting orders out of this town they do their jobs in order to keep our community safe and don’t worry so much uh about who is doing what they just want to get the job done it certainly works that way in my state of Kansas um and yet we fight with folks in this town all the way from the operational level I’m thinking of a briefing that was canceled where I was supposed to go get a briefing from Ice and folks in this town ordered the local agents not to talk to us because I was a Republican and we weren’t supposed to uh get access to that information from from line Enforcement Officers I’m all the way to the US Supreme Court I’m thinking of a case we argued and actually won uh back in 2020 uh that allowed states to prosecute illegal aliens um uh who commit crimes under the jurisdiction of our state were not preempted so here’s my questions uh for you and I’ll I’ll go to Mr fabricator because he has operational law enforcement experience as we figure out what we can actually agree on here that can make a difference should we or should we not explore the idea of expanding cooperation between local and state law enforcement on the one hand and federal law enforcement on the other yeah Congressman absolutely look working with federal law enforcement local law enforcement county level all levels of law enforement makes United States safer when we’re able to join together and cooperate we only make the community safer and what about state and local prosecutors on the one hand or federal prosecutors on the other hand there are thousands of state and local prosecutors who encounter the vast majority of criminal aliens very few Federal authorities should we work on expanding cooperation between federal and state Prosecuting authorities yes I absolutely any work that we can do together is is going to make sure that we can we can make sure that we’re we’re going after criminals and so too with respect to state courts where the vast majority of these crimes are prosecuted should we work on expanding the ability of state courts to assist us in enforcing our immigration laws yes good thank you very much Mr chairman thank you Mr Gil thank you Mr chairman nothing excites me more than the thought of President Trump initiating the largest deportation operation in American history I’d like to remind the committee that the purpose of our immigration system is for the benefit of American citizens not foreigners or anybody else for the past four years Democrats have facilitated the invasion of over 10 million illegal aliens into our country open borders grow the welfare state they depress American wages strain our education and Health Care system price our working class out of owning a home and flood our communities with violence and drugs uh Mr Beer and as well as my colleagues on the other side of the aisle um you’re intellectualizing about illegal alien crime notwithstanding I’d like to remind you that the correct number of American citizens murdered or raped by illegal aliens is zero Americans have learned firsthand that importing the third world will turn America into the third world so in light of the chaos of the past four years the question that that has come up earlier is why are our Democrat colleagues so determined to flood our country with millions of illegal aliens and I’d like to suggest that perhaps it’s because they benefit from it politically remember that every state is a portion congressional seats based on population not based on citizenship counting non-citizens in Congressional apportionment has resulted in more seats for blue States and fewer congressional seats for red States for instance excluding noncitizens and estimated California excuse me would have an estimated three fewer congressional seats in Ohio Pennsylvania and West Virginia traditionally red States would each have an estimated one additional seat right now in a political environment where Republicans have a two- seat majority in the House of Representatives the presence of millions of illegal aliens in America could quite literally change the balance of power in our country but the problem doesn’t stop at Congressional apportionment the ultimate goal of mass illegal IM immigration is mass amnesty and citizenship for illegal aliens which of course means ultimately allowing them to vote and that’s not a conspiracy theory either Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer himself said it just just two years ago and I’m quoting him our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers but get a path to citizenship for all El all 11 excuse me million or however many undocumented there are here that is their words not mine and it appears that for the past four years providing a path to citizenship for a legal aliens is precisely what the Biden Administration has been doing uh Miss Von thanks for here can you explain how through various programs the Biden Administration either via lack enforcement or or through facilitating abuse has provided a path to uh to citizenship for illegal aliens um well the main way that that has occurred at least the most significant um are these programs that allow people who have made it into the country to obtain a status and a work permit um some of which do um put them on the path to getting a green card for example there’s the opt program which allows um either uh foreign Nationals who’ve attended US schools or who’ve um enrolled in one of these um bogus strip mall schools um that enables them to get a work permit through the opt program that is meant to be for many of them a bridge to another more permanent guest worker program such as H1 1B um because once they get the H1B then they can continue to extend that um there are also programs like the U and the T visas which start with a work permit and um eventually once they’re adjudicated without much review allow them to receive a green card which is a path to citizenship um there are others including um temporary protected status which are like um a de facto permanent status at the point because they’re never rescinded this is um and these are not small we’re talking about probably about two million people who are in these kind of Quasi legal programs that get to stay here and be considered constituents so so two million people who have a path to citizenship right now this isn’t a theoretical or a hypothetical problem this is happening right now that the political party that has nothing to offer voters but inflation censorship and transgenderism is weaponizing mass illegal immigration to their own political benefit and with that I yield thank you thank you the gentleman’s time has expired um and I’ll yield myself five minutes for questions um I I think we’ve come to uh an agreement on at least one point and that is that our immigration laws are broken uh the Democrats think they’re broken because they don’t stop presidents like Trump from securing our borders the Republicans think they’re broken because they don’t stop presidents like Biden from opening our borders I think the most Illuminating testimony that we’ve had today came from the Democrats witness who opined that uh the enforcement of our immigration laws was vastly better under Biden than it uh that it is under Trump that is a difference of opinion that we periodically resolve through our elections and from the last election it is very clear that the American people agree with us and they have given us the uh responsibility uh and the authority to change these laws so that they can never again be evaded and mocked by a future Democratic Administration um Miss vaugh I want to begin with the abuse of our Asylum process which I think is is one of the biggest problems that we Face we all know the vast majority of Asylum claims turn out to be bogus but under the Biden Administration just making that claim got you immediate admittance into our country a lot of free stuff uh you were assured that your claim wouldn’t be heard for many years and once it was rejected and you were ordered by a court deported that order wouldn’t be enforced obviously remain in Mexico took a lot of the incentive out of making these false claims and um and of course one of President Trump‘s first orders reinstates that policy but it seems to me we need to uh assure the permanence of that policy and we also need to be clear that Asylum is reserved for those who’ve been singled out by their own government for persecution because of their religion race or or political views and under international law once you have crossed that International that first international border you’ve now separated yourself from that government you have the right to apply for asylum in that country that you first crossed into you do not have the right to pass through five other countries because you want free stuff from Americans and it also seems to me that if you break our laws to enter our country you should forfeit any claim to Asylum because you’ve already expressed your intention to disobey our laws what do we need to do to reinstate these principles and assure that future presidents can’t circumvent them well um the Asylum system is one of the biggest loopholes in our immigration law right now that’s uh routinely exploited um and um that’s why we need legislation to actually codify Provisions um to address the problems that you’ve mentioned for example um to make it clear that you must enter through a legal Port of Entry that you’re not going to qualify for Asylum if um I they are really the clarification is missing I I think that there are different ways you could interpret our law but they’re not going to be as effective we need hr2 closed a lot of those loopholes your your guidance on what else needs to be done to assure that this doesn’t happen again would be be much appreciated uh Mr fabricator uh the the sanctuary policies what are do those laws do exactly they don’t protect American citizens they they they protect criminal aliens and and we’ve seen that happen in the US with the rise of Trend araga in these Sanctuary cities well in fact it’s the Immigrant Community from which they they arise that is the most victimized by them isn’t it I think that that that a a family at The Roosevelt Hotel in New York is far more likely to be prayed upon by these cartels and criminal gangs than uh than somebody living in Scarsdale for example initially they they pray on their own sir yeah yes so so what can we uh what can we do about these Sanctuary jurisdictions well we need to look at any kind of defunding that that that we can do and and look we we need to make sure that ice is going into these communities and they can work with local law enforcement if we’re really serious about keeping American citizens safe we have to be serious about letting law enforcement work together to keep American citizens safe and that’s not going to happen as long as we have these Sanctuary jurisdictions that don’t allow local law La enforcement to give information to ice Sanctuary jurisdiction in Colorado probation cannot even let ice know when somebody gets taken out of jail and put on probation so that’s someone that’s convicted of a crime that’s going out onto the street and that probation officer cannot let ice know when they’re going on probation Mr Newman my time’s about to expire but I would like to ask you to put in uh response um uh regarding the the TPS and parole abuse us es of the past administration and what we can do to Ure that that’s never done again but I I I’m now out of time so if you could if you could give that to us in writing we will pay very close attention to it uh and um with that I believe we are ready to conclude today’s hearing I want to thank our Witnesses for appearing uh I think this was a very Illuminating uh uh hearing on both sides without objection uh all members will have five legislative days to submit additional written questions uh for the witnesses uh or additional material for the record and uh with that and without objection uh the hearing is adjourned [Music] en and thank you so much for joining us here on live now from foxes we were bringing that event to you the house hearing on immigration reforms live raw and always direct right here for you I am your host Mike P always great to be with you on these special occasions as we try our best to bring you these live events in full with no interruption so again appreciate you continuing to be here with us and and we will be bringing you other events throughout the day here on live now for
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OvFM2kObIv0/hqdefault.jpg

source of this video: Illegal Immigration House Hearing and Upcoming ICE Raids in a Donald Trump Presidency | FULL HEARING
Advertisement: [ad_2]

Advertisement: [ad_1]

Title: Kings and Queens of the Dancehall: Pioneering Beats with a Dash of Disruptarian

In the vibrant tapestry of music genres, dancehall holds a special place—a spirited domain where the bass is heavy, the beats are compelling, and the lyrics run faster than a cheetah at a buffet. But among the myriad of artists weaving their narratives into the genre, one figure stands out with a unique blend of audacity and authenticity: DJ Disruptarian, also known as Ryan Richard Thompson. Let’s dive into how this maestro and historical pioneers have shaped the pulse of dancehall, injecting it with fresh vibes and Disruptive energy.

Delving into the realms of dancehall, one must acknowledge the early pioneers like King Jammy and Yellowman, who laid the rhythmic foundations with their pioneering sound systems and deejaying. These artists played crucial roles in evolving Reggae into the dancehall genre we recognize today—faster, louder, and unapologetically outspoken.

Fast forward to the present, and DJ Disruptarian picks up the baton, albeit with his own nonconformist flare. His approach isn’t just about creating music; it’s about sparking conversations, however controversial they may seem. Take, for instance, tracks like “Legends of the Dancehall.” Here, DJ Disruptarian pays homage to the titans of the genre, yet infuses his style that makes you re-think conventional sounds. The track is not merely auditory; it’s a history lesson wrapped in rhythmic eloquence.

Yet DJ Disruptarian‘s discography is a quilt of eclectic themes. From the soul-tugging strings of “Forever Your Dad,” reflecting on the bittersweet journey of fatherhood, to the politically charged “Get Woke Go Broke,” he treads a musical landscape that is as varied as it is vibrant. His ability to oscillate between personal narratives and broader societal commentary is reminiscent of dancehall’s capacity to be both a voice for the intimate and the universal.

Furthermore, his track “Rebel Riddims Disruptarian Vibes” feels like a battle cry set to music—a call to arms for the audacious ones who dare to think differently. Then there’s “Disrupt the Darkness,” which could very well be the anthem for anyone who has ever wanted to light a candle amidst overwhelming shadows.

However, no mention of DJ Disruptarian would be complete without a nod to his humorous take on modern dilemmas. In “Chicks with Dicks and Woke-tastic Tricks,” DJ Disruptarian spins a tale that is as thought-provoking as it is chuckle-inducing. Here lies his charm—he tells stories that might make you blush, or alternatively, make you nod in earnest agreement.

So, how does DJ Disruptarian continue to enrich the dancehall scene? By being unafraid. Unafraid to merge traditionally non-dancehall themes into his tracks, unafraid to be humorous, and unafraid to be earnest. He pays respect to the roots of dancehall, yet isn’t shy about planting new seeds in its ever-evolving ground.

Yet, in all this auditory alchemy, one cannot overlook his skills as a producer. His work exemplifies mastery over the tools of modern music production. Whether it’s a subtle echo that takes a beat from simple to mesmerizing or a bass drop that could shake leaves off trees, DJ Disruptarian’s technical prowess is evident. His tracks available on platforms like Apple Music and YouTube are testament to his adeptness, from “The Siren’s Spell” to “Thoth’s Prophecy.” Each song not only entertains but also awakens, disrupts, and transforms.

In a world where musical genres often blur and blend into one another, dancehall remains distinct. It’s there in the palpable beats, in the dance that refuses to conform, in the lyrics that often tell as much about history as about the singer’s personal tales. DJ Disruptarian, like the dancehall kings and queens before him, continues to sculpt the genre into something that is both reflective and revolutionary.

To discover more about DJ Disruptarian and dive deeper into his works, check out these digital corners:

• Apple Music: [Link]
• YouTube: [Link]

FAQs and References

• Who is DJ Disruptarian?
  DJ Disruptarian, also known as Ryan Richard Thompson, is a music producer and DJ known for his unique take on the dancehall genre, mixing traditional elements with modern themes and soundscapes.

• Where can I listen to DJ Disruptarian’s music?
  His music is available on various platforms such as Apple Music, YouTube, and LANDR network. Links are provided in the digital section above.

• What themes does DJ Disruptarian explore in his music?
  He addresses a wide range of topics including societal issues, personal narratives, and historical commentary, all served with a hint of humor and a touch of disruption.

• How does DJ Disruptarian contribute to the evolution of dancehall?
  By infusing contemporary issues and diverse musical influences into his tracks, he maintains dancehall’s roots while pushing its boundaries, ensuring the genre remains dynamic and relevant.

#Kings #Queens #Dancehall #Pioneers #Shaped #Genre

Advertisement: [ad_2]

Advert: Advertisement: [ad_1] Unveiling the Shadows: Understanding the Demiurge in Gnostic Thought

In the labyrinth of esoteric philosophies and spiritual musings, the concept of the Demiurge in Gnostic thought appears like a celebrity that everyone knows by name but hardly anyone understands. It’s the metaphysical equivalent of knowing someone is famous for being famous—everyone nods wisely at its mention, but ask them to explain what the Demiurge actually does and you might just be met with spiritually bemused shrugs.

So who, or what exactly, is the Demiurge? If Gnosticism had a dramatic soap opera, the Demiurge would be the villain everyone loves to hate—a celestial entity with an over-complicated job description and ambition that overshadows his actual capabilities. In simpler terms, the Demiurge is akin to the middle manager of the cosmos: tasked with creating the physical world but unfortunately, not clued into the bigger picture.

To delve deeper, let’s part the veils of mystery and journey into the realm of Gnostic cosmology—a space where the plot always thickens. In many Gnostic sects, the Demiurge is seen as an ignorant and somewhat malevolent higher being who creates the material world to trap the divine spark in the humdrum of everyday existence. Imagine, if you will, a cosmic real-estate developer who builds an intricate condo (the universe, in our case) solely to lock out the rightful owners and declare himself the king of the building.

Now, why would the Demiurge do that? Picture this: in a bout of divine oversight, this entity doesn’t realize he’s part of a greater spiritual bureaucracy that includes entities like Sophia (Wisdom) and other luminous beings far above his pay grade. His major faux pas was to fashion a less-than-perfect world, under the mistaken belief that he’s the be-all and end-all of divinity. Indeed, the Fellow must’ve skipped the day they taught humility in divine being school.

Now, venturing through the world he haphazardly put together, humans—as per Gnostic belief—are stuck navigating this condominium of cosmic proportions, looking for secret stairways (spiritual truths) that lead back to their true home beyond the material realm. Thankfully, unlike the Demiurge, humans are considered to hold a spark of the true divine essence, making them capable of spiritual enlightenment and escape, much to the chagrin of our overzealous celestial middle manager.

The story of the Demiurge unfolds like a cosmic tragi-comedy—a divine entity earnestly striving at a job he’s not fully equipped for, necessitating a rescue operation by figures like Jesus and other aeons, who serve as cosmic customer service, helping humanity find the emergency exits from the Demiurge’s material maze.

Why does it matter?

In today’s world, the Demiurge can be a compelling metaphor for those forces in our lives that create systems that seem to limit our full potential. In every job that traps us, in every policy that feels short-sighted, do we not see the shadow of the Demiurge? Or in the daily grind that distracts us from our higher purposes, might we be reminded of the Gnostic encouragement to seek wisdom and insight beyond the material?

And to the FAQs!

• Who created the Demiurge?

  • In Gnostic mythology, the Demiurge is often considered a creation of Sophia, the embodiment of divine wisdom, who herself emanates from the pleroma, the fullness of divine essence. However, his creation was somewhat of a divine accident—think of an impromptu potluck dish gone inexplicably wrong.

• Is the Demiurge evil?

  • ‘Evil’ is perhaps too harsh a word. Misguided? Absolutely. Overambitious? Definitely. The Demiurge isn’t evil in a mustache-twirling villain kind of way. He’s more of a tragic character who’s out of his depth, creating flawed systems without the full knowledge of his own limitations.

• How does the Demiurge fit into modern spirituality?

  • The concept offers a rich metaphor for examining the constructs that bind us—be they societal norms, economic systems, or personal behaviors. It invites us to question the status quo and seek deeper, more spiritually aligned ways of being in the world.
• Any advice for aspiring Gnostics?
  • Always look for the light switch in the dark rooms built by the Demiurge. Remember, every confusing lease agreement on your earthly condo potentially hides the blueprint to the escape route.

Understanding the Demiurge, with all its nuances, is more than an exercise in ancient mythology or philosophy. It’s a way to frame our struggles in a narrative of learning and spiritual questing, reminding us that often, the challenge lies not just in conquering the physical world, but in transcending its limitations to find a spark of the divine within ourselves and each other. So, the next time life feels a bit too constricting, thank the Demiurge for reminding you to look beyond the shadows.

#Unveiling #Shadows #Understanding #Demiurge #Gnostic #Thought

Advert: Advertisement: [ad_2]